On 24/09/2012 16:04, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 24/09/2012 13:19, Remy Maucherat wrote:
>> On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 12:35 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> ab -c 4 -k -n 100 http://localhost:8080/test-1k.txt
>>
>> The concurrency of the test is very low, there will be only 4 threads
>> used with that tes
On 24/09/2012 13:19, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 12:35 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> ab -c 4 -k -n 100 http://localhost:8080/test-1k.txt
>
> The concurrency of the test is very low, there will be only 4 threads
> used with that test, which means decent sync performance.
Once
On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 12:35 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
> ab -c 4 -k -n 100 http://localhost:8080/test-1k.txt
The concurrency of the test is very low, there will be only 4 threads
used with that test, which means decent sync performance.
Although with NIO the executor count can remain lower tha
All,
You will have a seen a handful of changes over the last few days related
to performance and garbage generation. I wanted to provide a little
background.
As part of testing the new Resources implementation I have been running
the follow ab test:
ab -c 4 -k -n 100 http://localhost:8080/te
