Re: Re-factoring TLD parsing

2012-08-17 Thread sebb
On 17 August 2012 05:00, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Sebb, > > On 8/16/12 7:11 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 16 August 2012 23:44, Christopher Schultz >> wrote: >>> >>> I had a conversation in Vancouver with David Blevins about the scourge >>> of JAR-scanning in general (in that case, we were discussing

Re: Re-factoring TLD parsing

2012-08-17 Thread Mark Thomas
Christopher Schultz wrote: >All, > >The first item in the TOMCAT-NEXT.txt is this: > > 1. Refactor the TLD parsing. TLDs are currently parsed twice. Once by >Catalina looking for listeners and once by Jasper. > >I had a conversation in Vancouver with David Blevins about the scourge >of JAR-

Re: Re-factoring TLD parsing

2012-08-16 Thread Christopher Schultz
Sebb, On 8/16/12 7:11 PM, sebb wrote: > On 16 August 2012 23:44, Christopher Schultz > wrote: >> >> I had a conversation in Vancouver with David Blevins about the scourge >> of JAR-scanning in general (in that case, we were discussing >> annotation-processing) and I suggested that a generic JAR s

Re: Re-factoring TLD parsing

2012-08-16 Thread sebb
On 16 August 2012 23:44, Christopher Schultz wrote: > All, > > The first item in the TOMCAT-NEXT.txt is this: > > 1. Refactor the TLD parsing. TLDs are currently parsed twice. Once by > Catalina looking for listeners and once by Jasper. > > I had a conversation in Vancouver with David Blevins

Re-factoring TLD parsing

2012-08-16 Thread Christopher Schultz
All, The first item in the TOMCAT-NEXT.txt is this: 1. Refactor the TLD parsing. TLDs are currently parsed twice. Once by Catalina looking for listeners and once by Jasper. I had a conversation in Vancouver with David Blevins about the scourge of JAR-scanning in general (in that case, we we