Re: tomcat-oacc

2008-03-27 Thread Henri Gomez
It's a good initiative and sandbox is where experimental code should start. Gentlemen, don't feel insulted or whatever, to discuss code, reviewers should see it and that's why sandbox. I'm very happy to see new codes in sandbox these days like OACC or Tomcat-Lite, good ideas should be shared for

Re: tomcat-oacc

2008-03-27 Thread Rainer Jung
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: +++ CUT +++ All in all I feel accused by the above formulation. the answer to this all lies in the fact, that I didn't see an email on tomcat-dev about OACC creation, so if I missed it, my apologies, but I cant recall seeing one. Th

Re: tomcat-oacc

2008-03-27 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
jean-frederic clere wrote: +++ CUT +++ All in all I feel accused by the above formulation. the answer to this all lies in the fact, that I didn't see an email on tomcat-dev about OACC creation, so if I missed it, my apologies, but I cant recall seeing one. That is in sandbox. sandbox is sup

Re: tomcat-oacc

2008-03-27 Thread jean-frederic clere
+++ CUT +++ All in all I feel accused by the above formulation. the answer to this all lies in the fact, that I didn't see an email on tomcat-dev about OACC creation, so if I missed it, my apologies, but I cant recall seeing one. That is in sandbox. sandbox is supposed to be a play-ground fo

Re: tomcat-oacc

2008-03-27 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
But what are we talking about: - "your codebase": its our codebase. If we had to find a single person for this cluster codebase, then it would be your codebase. As everyone can see from yesterdays commit, the codebase is nearly identical from the TC 5.5 codebase. I don't want to have "my" c

Re: tomcat-oacc

2008-03-27 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Rainer Jung wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists schrieb: hi Rainer, so to tell the true tale, isn't the story... - You got customers on 5.5 using session replication Of course, and that helped in making the 5.5 cluster better. - Your customers want to move to Tomcat 6 I do hope so! I thought t

Re: tomcat-oacc

2008-03-27 Thread Rainer Jung
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists schrieb: - Java 5 dispatcher: I mostly agree. I got lost in the code. The code I thought was responsible was transport/PooledSender.java which uses a fixed pool of threads without queueing. I overlooked somehow the Executor with queue in the Java 5 dispatcher. Neverthele

Re: tomcat-oacc

2008-03-27 Thread Rainer Jung
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists schrieb: hi Rainer, so to tell the true tale, isn't the story... - You got customers on 5.5 using session replication Of course, and that helped in making the 5.5 cluster better. - Your customers want to move to Tomcat 6 I do hope so! I thought that's something we w

Re: tomcat-oacc

2008-03-26 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Rainer Jung wrote: Hi Filip, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists schrieb: - Java 5 dispatcher: I mostly agree. I got lost in the code. The code I thought was responsible was transport/PooledSender.java which uses a fixed pool of threads without queueing. I overlooked somehow the Executor with queue in

Re: tomcat-oacc

2008-03-26 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
hi Rainer, so to tell the true tale, isn't the story... - You got customers on 5.5 using session replication - Your customers want to move to Tomcat 6 - You're not confident about the maturity of Tomcat 6's clustering codebase, mainly cause you haven't used it, even though it was originally dev

Re: tomcat-oacc

2008-03-26 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi Filip, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists schrieb: Rainer Jung wrote: But I do not only have these very abstract concerns. There is room for improvement and I'll happily help as I did in 2004 for the TC 5.0/5.5 cluster. Examples for improvements: - monitoring (the old MBeans are gone and there's

Re: tomcat-oacc

2008-03-26 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Rainer Jung wrote: But I do not only have these very abstract concerns. There is room for improvement and I'll happily help as I did in 2004 for the TC 5.0/5.5 cluster. Examples for improvements: - monitoring (the old MBeans are gone and there's no good alternative) ClusterJMXHelper.java

Re: tomcat-oacc

2008-03-26 Thread Peter Rossbach
Hi, I also see a lot of projects that are happy with a tomcat 5.5 cluster at tomcat 6 code base. The code change are very limited. I don't thing that we open a new long term implementation base. It is a fair migration path to tc6. New ideas must we add to the tomcat 6 ha and tribes modules.

Re: tomcat-oacc

2008-03-26 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi Filip, sorry, that this mail will be lengthy, but I prefer to explain my reasons for OACC in more detail. Filip Hanik - Dev Lists schrieb: -- The sandbox provides a port of TC 5.5 cluster for Tomcat 6 in order to ease Tomcat 6 migration for webapps using Tomcat 5.5 cluster. Using OACC

Re: tomcat-oacc

2008-03-26 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Rainer Jung wrote: Hi Jean-Frederic, jean-frederic clere wrote: Hi, What is the goal of tomcat-oacc exactly. 1 - Replace the actual tc-trunk cluster. No. 2 - Port the tc-5.5.x code and have an alternate cluster. Yes, reason for alternate see below. 3 - Just a try for the fun. That wo

Re: tomcat-oacc

2008-03-26 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi Jean-Frederic, jean-frederic clere wrote: Hi, What is the goal of tomcat-oacc exactly. 1 - Replace the actual tc-trunk cluster. No. 2 - Port the tc-5.5.x code and have an alternate cluster. Yes, reason for alternate see below. 3 - Just a try for the fun. That would be fine as well,