Re: svn re-org complete

2009-08-12 Thread sebb
On 12/08/2009, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2009/8/12 sebb : > > > On 12/08/2009, Mark Thomas wrote: > >> sebb wrote: > >> > On 07/08/2009, Mark Thomas wrote: > >> >> The svn re-organisation is complete. > >> > > >> > Is the file build/BUILDING.txt still accurate? > >> > >> > >> Yes.

Re: svn re-org complete

2009-08-12 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2009/8/12 sebb : > On 12/08/2009, Mark Thomas wrote: >> sebb wrote: >>  > On 07/08/2009, Mark Thomas wrote: >>  >> The svn re-organisation is complete. >>  > >>  > Is the file build/BUILDING.txt still accurate? >> >> >> Yes. It is the top-level build.xml that needs tweaking. >> >> >>  > Presumabl

Re: svn re-org complete

2009-08-12 Thread sebb
On 12/08/2009, Mark Thomas wrote: > sebb wrote: > > On 07/08/2009, Mark Thomas wrote: > >> The svn re-organisation is complete. > > > > Is the file build/BUILDING.txt still accurate? > > > Yes. It is the top-level build.xml that needs tweaking. > > > > Presumably I would need to change "curr

Re: svn re-org complete

2009-08-12 Thread Mark Thomas
sebb wrote: > On 07/08/2009, Mark Thomas wrote: >> The svn re-organisation is complete. > > Is the file build/BUILDING.txt still accurate? Yes. It is the top-level build.xml that needs tweaking. > Presumably I would need to change "current.loc" but it's not clear to > me what this needs to be c

Re: svn re-org complete

2009-08-11 Thread sebb
On 07/08/2009, Mark Thomas wrote: > The svn re-organisation is complete. Is the file build/BUILDING.txt still accurate? I've just tried following it and Ant reports: > Buildfile: build.xml check.source: get.source: checkout: [echo] If the checkout fails, see http://tomcat.apache