Re: svn commit: r701093 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 14:11 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote: > Remy Maucherat wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 11:50 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Author: markt > >> Date: Thu Oct 2 04:50:08 2008 > >> New Revision: 701093 > >> > >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=701093&view=rev > >> Log: >

Re: svn commit: r701093 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

Remy Maucherat wrote: > On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 11:50 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Author: markt >> Date: Thu Oct 2 04:50:08 2008 >> New Revision: 701093 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=701093&view=rev >> Log: >> Withdraw patch for further work > > Even if it did not cause any reg

Re: svn commit: r701093 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 11:50 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Author: markt > Date: Thu Oct 2 04:50:08 2008 > New Revision: 701093 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=701093&view=rev > Log: > Withdraw patch for further work Even if it did not cause any regressions, why was it proposed ? It