Rainer Jung wrote:
> jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> Rémy Maucherat wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 07:28 -0400, Tim Funk wrote:
There was a request in bugzilla to pass in a new env variable called
JAVA_EXE (or similar).
Could that be an acceptable alternative? Then it would make
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 07:28 -0400, Tim Funk wrote:
There was a request in bugzilla to pass in a new env variable called
JAVA_EXE (or similar).
Could that be an acceptable alternative? Then it would make the bug
submitter happy since he can sym
Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 07:28 -0400, Tim Funk wrote:
>> There was a request in bugzilla to pass in a new env variable called
>> JAVA_EXE (or similar).
>>
>> Could that be an acceptable alternative? Then it would make the bug
>> submitter happy since he can symlink my_program
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 07:28 -0400, Tim Funk wrote:
> There was a request in bugzilla to pass in a new env variable called
> JAVA_EXE (or similar).
>
> Could that be an acceptable alternative? Then it would make the bug
> submitter happy since he can symlink my_program_that_i_can_see_in_ps to
>
+1 for that env variable,
but also autodetection must be implemented
Peter
Am 17.10.2007 um 13:28 schrieb Tim Funk:
There was a request in bugzilla to pass in a new env variable
called JAVA_EXE (or similar).
Could that be an acceptable alternative? Then it would make the bug
submitter h
There was a request in bugzilla to pass in a new env variable called
JAVA_EXE (or similar).
Could that be an acceptable alternative? Then it would make the bug
submitter happy since he can symlink my_program_that_i_can_see_in_ps to
java.
-Tim
Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 05:
Hi Remy,
but is'nt /usr/lib/java the correct value to JRE_HOME ?
Regards
Peter
Am 17.10.2007 um 13:10 schrieb Rémy Maucherat:
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 05:47 +0200, Peter Rossbach wrote:
Hi Remy,
I think the patch is incomplete
this line seem not correct:
+else
+ JRE_HOME=/usr
+
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 05:47 +0200, Peter Rossbach wrote:
> Hi Remy,
>
> I think the patch is incomplete
>
> this line seem not correct:
>
> +else
> + JRE_HOME=/usr
> +fi
>
> better
> +else
> + JRE_HOME=/usr/bin/java
> +fi
The path to the Java executable is $JRE_HOME/b
Hi Remy,
I think the patch is incomplete
this line seem not correct:
+else
+ JRE_HOME=/usr
+fi
better
+else
+ JRE_HOME=/usr/bin/java
+fi
Peter
Am 17.10.2007 um 03:11 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Author: remm
Date: Tue Oct 16 18:11:39 2007
New Revision: 585313
URL: