On 21/06/18 08:18, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Noticed the missing ciphers.sh when doing the 9.0.10 check. Looking at
> the list of file mode setting in the package-tgz target of build.xml, I
> wonder:
>
> - shouldn't we just use name="bin/*.sh" like we do for *.exe instead of
> listing each file individ
Noticed the missing ciphers.sh when doing the 9.0.10 check. Looking at
the list of file mode setting in the package-tgz target of build.xml, I
wonder:
- shouldn't we just use name="bin/*.sh" like we do for *.exe instead of
listing each file individually? I don't see any "*.sh" we would not lik
