On 22/12/2009 07:32, Rainer Frey (Inxmail GmbH) wrote:
> On Monday 21 December 2009 18:13:51 Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Konstantin's comments about the JDBC-ODBC bridge got me looking at this
>> more closely. There was a bug in the de-registration code that mean it
>> was a little over-zealous on its cl
On Monday 21 December 2009 18:13:51 Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 21/12/2009 15:59, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > For an example of a container level lifecycle listener take a look at
> > this commit. That should give you the idea.
> >
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=828196
>
> This migh
On 21/12/2009 15:59, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 21/12/2009 15:13, Rainer Frey (Inxmail GmbH) wrote:
>> On Monday 21 December 2009 15:23:42 Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> The memory leak is caused by the DriverManager implementation. It holds
>>> a reference to the Driver. If the Driver was loaded by the web
>
On 21/12/2009 15:13, Rainer Frey (Inxmail GmbH) wrote:
> On Monday 21 December 2009 15:23:42 Mark Thomas wrote:
>> The memory leak is caused by the DriverManager implementation. It holds
>> a reference to the Driver. If the Driver was loaded by the web
>> application then the Driver holds a referen
On Monday 21 December 2009 15:23:42 Mark Thomas wrote:
> Most do, but it doesn't appear to be required. In your circumstances,
> you could use a LifecycleListener defined at the container level that
> just called Class.forName(String).
Hi Mark,
what do you mean with "container level" here?
Rain
On Monday 21 December 2009 15:23:42 Mark Thomas wrote:
> The memory leak is caused by the DriverManager implementation. It holds
> a reference to the Driver. If the Driver was loaded by the web
> application then the Driver holds a reference to the WebappClassLoader.
> This in turn holds references
On 21/12/2009 10:12, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Later today I will tag and go for the release, make sure all the patches
> you want to see in are committed :-)
I've finished proposing everything I'd like to see in 6.0.21. I'll try
and commit anything that gets enough votes before the ta
On 21/12/2009 14:11, Rainer Frey (Inxmail GmbH) wrote:
> On Monday 21 December 2009 12:04:59 Mark Thomas wrote:
>> My guess is that you are relying on the auto-driver registration
>> process. It is this process that triggers the memory leak so Tomcat now
>> forcibly de-registers any drivers the JVM
On Monday 21 December 2009 12:04:59 Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 21/12/2009 10:53, Rainer Frey wrote:
[...]
> > but I hoped that someone would take a
> > look at issue https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48214
> > before a release is made
>
> I hadn't forgotten that one - I just hadn't g
On 21/12/2009 10:53, Rainer Frey wrote:
> On Monday 21 December 2009 11:12:12 jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Later today I will tag and go for the release, make sure all the patches
>> you want to see in are committed :-)
>
> Well, I'm no committer and I don't understand the relevant code
On Monday 21 December 2009 11:12:12 jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Later today I will tag and go for the release, make sure all the patches
> you want to see in are committed :-)
Well, I'm no committer and I don't understand the relevant code well enough
to possibly create a patch, but I h
11 matches
Mail list logo
