Le 13/05/2019 à 12:17, Mark Thomas a écrit :
> If I am understanding this all correctly, the proposed way forward is to
> (eventually) replace the Ant compiler with the JSR199 based Javac
> compiler? If so, then +1 from me.
I mostly aim at providing an easy way to use the new language features
in
On 11/05/2019 21:23, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 11/05/2019 à 00:46, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
>
>> - I'm not sure about the performance, ECJ was known to be faster than
>> javac in the past but I don't know if it's still true today.
>
> I ran a quick test on an old Core 2 Duo with a SSD, compiling
Le 11/05/2019 à 00:46, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
> - I'm not sure about the performance, ECJ was known to be faster than
> javac in the past but I don't know if it's still true today.
I ran a quick test on an old Core 2 Duo with a SSD, compiling Tomcat and
another Ant based project of mine. The Ec
Le 09/05/2019 à 00:34, Mark Thomas a écrit :
> +1
>
> Need to remove the @author tags and add some info on how to configure
> jasper to use them.
Ok will do.
> A few daft questions:
>
> 1. If we used the JSR199Complier by default would that allow us to
> remove the Eclipse compiler as a depen
On 08/05/2019 21:58, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 10:31 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've rebased the javax.tools JSP compiler on top of the current master
>> branch :
>>
>> https://github.com/ebourg/tomcat/tree/jasper-javax-tools-support
>>
>> Please let me kno
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 10:31 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've rebased the javax.tools JSP compiler on top of the current master
> branch :
>
> https://github.com/ebourg/tomcat/tree/jasper-javax-tools-support
>
> Please let me know how you feel about this stuff and if it's worth mergi
Hi all,
I've rebased the javax.tools JSP compiler on top of the current master
branch :
https://github.com/ebourg/tomcat/tree/jasper-javax-tools-support
Please let me know how you feel about this stuff and if it's worth merging.
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 09/04/2018 à 17:28, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
Le 04/04/2018 à 09:54, Mark Thomas a écrit :
> I like the idea of simplifying the integration of javac - irrespective
> of the reasoning for wanting to use javac. I guess it is something to
> look at in Tomcat 10. Whether or not it gets back-ported is a different
> question. I guess it depends wha
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 9:54 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 04/04/18 08:52, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Emmanuel Bourg
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Has anyone considered using the javax.tools API (JSR 199) to compile the
> >> JSPs yet? This could provide a unifie
On 04/04/18 08:52, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Has anyone considered using the javax.tools API (JSR 199) to compile the
>> JSPs yet? This could provide a unified API to compile the JSPs since ECJ
>> also implements this API, and
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Has anyone considered using the javax.tools API (JSR 199) to compile the
> JSPs yet? This could provide a unified API to compile the JSPs since ECJ
> also implements this API, and it would simplify the integration of javac
> with
11 matches
Mail list logo
