RE: Unit tests and trunk

2012-07-18 Thread Filip Hanik (mailing lists)
; To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: Unit tests and trunk > > On 12/07/2012 02:05, Filip Hanik wrote: > > I can reproduce the bug in both our unit tests and the original bug > report. further more I can turn non blocking into blocking by opening an > clos

Re: Unit tests and trunk

2012-07-12 Thread Mark Thomas
On 12/07/2012 02:05, Filip Hanik wrote: > I can reproduce the bug in both our unit tests and the original bug report. > further more I can turn non blocking into blocking by opening an closing a > selector that is never used. > > definitely a bug, since a jvm/network flag resolves it. > > whi

Re: Unit tests and trunk

2012-07-11 Thread Filip Hanik
I can reproduce the bug in both our unit tests and the original bug report. further more I can turn non blocking into blocking by opening an closing a selector that is never used. definitely a bug, since a jvm/network flag resolves it. while your vm may support ipv6, there is still an additio

Re: Unit tests and trunk

2012-07-11 Thread Mark Thomas
On 11/07/2012 23:30, Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote: > I wasn't able to reproduce on a Win 7 VM because the VM environment itself > doesn't support IPv6 Given who we work for, the opportunities for humorous comments is extensive :) I'll settle for saying that I've double checked the VM I have

RE: Unit tests and trunk

2012-07-11 Thread Filip Hanik (mailing lists)
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 4:30 PM > To: 'Tomcat Developers List' > Subject: RE: Unit tests and trunk > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 4:28 PM > > To: To

RE: Unit tests and trunk

2012-07-11 Thread Filip Hanik (mailing lists)
> -Original Message- > From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] > Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 4:28 PM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: Unit tests and trunk > > On 11/07/2012 22:39, Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote: > > Ok, I have a reso

Re: Unit tests and trunk

2012-07-11 Thread Mark Thomas
stalled at the network stack >> >> Filip >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 1:32 PM >>> To: Tomcat Developers List >>> Subject: Re: Unit tests and trunk >

RE: Unit tests and trunk

2012-07-11 Thread Filip Hanik (mailing lists)
bit-server-hangs-on-socket.html > -Original Message- > From: Filip Hanik (mailing lists) [mailto:devli...@hanik.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 2:54 PM > To: 'Tomcat Developers List' > Subject: RE: Unit tests and trunk > > The idea of creating a VM th

RE: Unit tests and trunk

2012-07-11 Thread Filip Hanik (mailing lists)
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 1:32 PM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: Unit tests and trunk > > On 11/07/2012 20:13, Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote: > > > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Filip Hanik (mailing lists) [mailto:devli...@h

Re: Unit tests and trunk

2012-07-11 Thread Mark Thomas
On 11/07/2012 20:13, Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Filip Hanik (mailing lists) [mailto:devli...@hanik.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 10:13 AM >> To: 'Tomcat Developers List' >> Subject: RE: U

RE: Unit tests and trunk

2012-07-11 Thread Filip Hanik (mailing lists)
> -Original Message- > From: Filip Hanik (mailing lists) [mailto:devli...@hanik.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 10:13 AM > To: 'Tomcat Developers List' > Subject: RE: Unit tests and trunk > > > > > -Original Message- > &

RE: Unit tests and trunk

2012-07-11 Thread Filip Hanik (mailing lists)
> -Original Message- > From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] > Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 2:45 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: Unit tests and trunk > > On 11/07/2012 02:27, Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote: > > Here's what I

Re: Unit tests and trunk

2012-07-11 Thread Mark Thomas
p; buf.hasRemaining()) { > if (keycount > 0) { //only write if we were registered for > a write > int cnt = socket.write(buf); //write the data > >> -Original Message- >> From: Filip Hanik (mailing lists) [mailto:devli...@hanik.com]

RE: Unit tests and trunk

2012-07-10 Thread Filip Hanik (mailing lists)
data > -Original Message- > From: Filip Hanik (mailing lists) [mailto:devli...@hanik.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 10:43 AM > To: 'Tomcat Developers List' > Subject: RE: Unit tests and trunk > > Ok, definitely a bug in Java 7/Windows 7. > If I turn on

RE: Unit tests and trunk

2012-07-10 Thread Filip Hanik (mailing lists)
Hanik (mailing lists) [mailto:devli...@hanik.com] > Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 2:31 PM > To: 'Tomcat Developers List' > Subject: RE: Unit tests and trunk > > This failure happens when the write blocks, and we enter the Selector > for a > write operation. &g

RE: Unit tests and trunk

2012-07-09 Thread Filip Hanik (mailing lists)
This failure happens when the write blocks, and we enter the Selector for a write operation. filip > -Original Message- > From: Filip Hanik (mailing lists) [mailto:devli...@hanik.com] > Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 2:23 PM > To: 'Tomcat Developers List' > Subject:

RE: Unit tests and trunk

2012-07-09 Thread Filip Hanik (mailing lists)
I'm on Windows 7 and see TestOutputBuffer fail inconsistently with Java 7 Most runs are failures. I'll be looking into this this week > -Original Message- > From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] > Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 4:33 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Unit test