Re: Tomcat Native Question

2006-03-16 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: It's irrelevant. 5.5.16 will not work with 1.1.1 jknative is getting there, for sure :) But is it there yet? I should have asked the question this way instead... "Is jknative a faster moving target than the Tomcat 5.5 releases themselves?" -

Re: Tomcat Native Question

2006-03-16 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Mladen Turk wrote: It's irrelevant. 5.5.16 will not work with 1.1.1 Then I'd think there are two solutions; 1. repackage 5.5.16 -without- jknative. 2. roll 5.5.17 with jknative 1.1.2 It sounds like the 5.5.16 package is fundementally flawed. Retracting a component to avoid confusion amoung

Re: Tomcat Native Question

2006-03-16 Thread Mladen Turk
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Fenlason, Josh wrote: I should have checked this before the vote for 5.5.16 was closed, but I just realized that in 5.5.16 the native connector is still at 1.1.1. Question, does TC-Native 1.1.1 share the same flaw as mod_jk, mod_proxy_ajp? It's irrelevant. 5.5

Re: Tomcat Native Question

2006-03-16 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Fenlason, Josh wrote: I should have checked this before the vote for 5.5.16 was closed, but I just realized that in 5.5.16 the native connector is still at 1.1.1. Question, does TC-Native 1.1.1 share the same flaw as mod_jk, mod_proxy_ajp? We would need to repack the 5.5.16 or release 5.5.17

Re: Tomcat Native Question

2006-03-15 Thread Mladen Turk
Fenlason, Josh wrote: I should have checked this before the vote for 5.5.16 was closed, but I just realized that in 5.5.16 the native connector is still at 1.1.1. Me too :( That's bad. Does the Tomcat native connector have it's own release cycle? Yes. We would need to repack the 5.5.16 or r