Re: Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha

Yoav Shapira wrote: > > What did we miss? Was it a formal announcement to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > about 6.0.1 stability? Was it formally marking the 6.0.1 time/date > poll as a voting thread and posting its results? What you are missing is pretty straightforward. It's that you can't have a release

Re: Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha

Hi, I understand what Bill is saying. Let's talk specifics to see what we missed. We had a poll on this public mailing list to decide on a time and date to cut 6.0.1. We agreed on a time/date, and cut the release then. We announced here that the release was available and said we'd have a stabi

Re: Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha

Mladen Turk wrote: > William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> Guys - something got broken again in your release process against ASF >> policy... >> I don't see three +1's for any of the recent postings to your >> downloads page. >> > > Nothing got broken. Actually it did, because I've followed the list for

Re: Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Guys - something got broken again in your release process against ASF policy... I don't see three +1's for any of the recent postings to your downloads page. Nothing got broken. Tomcat is probably one of the latest remaining projects where the developers and PMC st

Re: Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Guys - something got broken again in your release process against ASF policy... I don't see three +1's for any of the recent postings to your downloads page. +1 -- Mladen - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha

I could swear we had agreed before the release candidate was posted to call the first couple of 6.0 builds alpha... +1 for 6.0.1 as alpha. Yoav On 11/17/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Guys - something got broken again in your release process against ASF policy... I don't

Re: Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha

+1 -- 6.0.2 is beta, Am 17.11.2006 um 10:46 schrieb William A. Rowe, Jr.: Guys - something got broken again in your release process against ASF policy... I don't see three +1's for any of the recent postings to your downloads page. Please remedy this - even if it's a matter of 3 +1's for

Re: Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha

+1 2006/11/17, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Guys - something got broken again in your release process against ASF policy... I don't see three +1's for any of the recent postings to your downloads page. Please remedy this - even if it's a matter of 3 +1's for 'alpha'? Remy Maucher

Re: Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha

Guys - something got broken again in your release process against ASF policy... I don't see three +1's for any of the recent postings to your downloads page. Please remedy this - even if it's a matter of 3 +1's for 'alpha'? Remy Maucherat wrote: > Hi, > > Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha is now available for

Re: Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha

Yoav Shapira wrote: Hi, Comments: -- There's an empty README.txt file in the root unpacked directory. -- The release notes still note markt as the last modifier of the file, and have the @VERSION@ CVS macro unexpanded. > -- The examples link on the welcome page is broken (a link to > examples/j

Re: Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha

Hi, Comments: -- There's an empty README.txt file in the root unpacked directory. -- The release notes still note markt as the last modifier of the file, and have the @VERSION@ CVS macro unexpanded. -- Startup is nice and fast out of the box, as is shutdown -- We need to update the copyright on t