On 01/10/2012 10:52, Mark Thomas wrote:
> OK. All the proposed patches are applied and 5.5.x is ready to tag and
> roll the release. Jim?
Jim is unlikely to be able to do this in the next few weeks so I propose
to attempt this myself as 5.5.x is now end-of-life and we need to get
the final releas
On 01/10/2012 09:11, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 20/09/2012 17:45, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> Jim,
>>
>> On 7/25/12 7:25 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jul 24, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>
On 24/07/2012 14:40, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Any interest in seeing a 5.5.36 release
On 20/09/2012 17:45, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Jim,
>
> On 7/25/12 7:25 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 24, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>>> On 24/07/2012 14:40, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Any interest in seeing a 5.5.36 release in the near future?
>>>
>>> We should to tie u
Jim,
On 7/25/12 7:25 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Jul 24, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 24/07/2012 14:40, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> Any interest in seeing a 5.5.36 release in the near future?
>>
>> We should to tie up the remaining loose ends before 5.5.x is EOL. No
>> great ru
On Jul 24, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 24/07/2012 14:40, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Any interest in seeing a 5.5.36 release in the near future?
>
> We should to tie up the remaining loose ends before 5.5.x is EOL. No
> great rush at the moment though.
>
Yeah, that's my plan.
On 24/07/2012 14:40, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Any interest in seeing a 5.5.36 release in the near future?
We should to tie up the remaining loose ends before 5.5.x is EOL. No
great rush at the moment though.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe
From my perspective only 6.0.x and higher are interesting at this
point, but I may be in the minority here.
On 7/24/2012 7:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Any interest in seeing a 5.5.36 release in the near future?
-
To unsubscrib
