Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
oki doki, if we don't have any other feedback, I will make the following
adjustments
1. Use NSIS 2.0.0
Normally, the build structure is simpler with 6.0, and it seems there
won't be any such gotchas.
Rémy
-
oki doki, if we don't have any other feedback, I will make the following
adjustments
1. Use NSIS 2.0.0
2. Change the wording of LD_ASSUME_KERNEL in the release notes
and cut another build tomorrow
Filip
Remy Maucherat wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jason Brittain wrote:
Then, later, I
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jason Brittain wrote:
Then, later, I needed Java 1.5.x features, so I upgraded it to
Sun Java 1.5.0. At the time that I upgraded just the JDK, I
knew very well that I have LD_ASSUME_KERNEL set, but I
since I didn't upgrade the OS (same kernel & libs) I left that
sett
Jason Brittain wrote:
>
> Then, later, I needed Java 1.5.x features, so I upgraded it to
> Sun Java 1.5.0. At the time that I upgraded just the JDK, I
> knew very well that I have LD_ASSUME_KERNEL set, but I
> since I didn't upgrade the OS (same kernel & libs) I left that
> setting alone to see i
Hi guys.
On 8/29/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
We need to clarify the message according to Bill's comments from a
thread on this list last week.
Clarifying it would be preferable.
The message is still correct for some
users, especially those using Tomcat 4.1, JDK 1.4, and
Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
We need to clarify the message according to Bill's comments from a
thread on this list last week. The message is still correct for some
users, especially those using Tomcat 4.1, JDK 1.4, and certain Linux
kernels.
It was for RH9 JDK1.4.0 and
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
We need to clarify the message according to Bill's comments from a
thread on this list last week. The message is still correct for some
users, especially those using Tomcat 4.1, JDK 1.4, and certain Linux
kernels.
It was for RH9 JDK1.4.0 and 1.3.1... Old stuff.
Look to
Hi,
We need to clarify the message according to Bill's comments from a
thread on this list last week. The message is still correct for some
users, especially those using Tomcat 4.1, JDK 1.4, and certain Linux
kernels. We should make it clear the message does not apply to all
situations, should n
Hi Filip,
I can't give the correct recommendations, but explain the flag:
The flag tells the loader not to load the default thread library, but
instead another - usually older - one. Linux had incompatible changes in
it's thread implementation and since the distros bundle so much
software, they h
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
Cool. The directory structure and signatures look good. We need to
update the release notes
(http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/v5.5.18-beta/RELEASE-NOTES) to
remove the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL section on Linux, as Bill (IIRC) pointed
out the day.
ok before I remove the LD_ASSUME
great, I will let the feedback gather up a little bit, (waiting for the
TCK tests to complete)
then make the adjustments
Filip
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
Cool. The directory structure and signatures look good. We need to
update the release notes
(http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/v5.5.18-beta/RE
Hi,
Cool. The directory structure and signatures look good. We need to
update the release notes
(http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/v5.5.18-beta/RELEASE-NOTES) to
remove the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL section on Linux, as Bill (IIRC) pointed
out the day.
Yoav
On 8/28/06, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PR
12 matches
Mail list logo
