On 08.01.2010 23:10, Yoav Shapira wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Konstantin Kolinko
wrote:
2010/1/6 Mark Thomas:
On 06/01/2010 00:27, Costin Manolache wrote:
Also, I would like to know if other comitters are OK with (temporarily -
i.e. until the 7.0 release vote) including lite in th
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Konstantin Kolinko
wrote:
> 2010/1/6 Mark Thomas :
>> On 06/01/2010 00:27, Costin Manolache wrote:
>>> Also, I would like to know if other comitters are OK with (temporarily -
>>> i.e. until the 7.0 release vote) including lite in the tomcat7 builds,
>>> so people c
On 08/01/2010 20:34, Henri Gomez wrote:
> Could you do it again ?
I could (as could any other committer) but I'd rather wait a day or so
until I finish off this JSP/EL work. I'm almost there...
Mark
>
> 2010/1/8 Mark Thomas :
>> On 08/01/2010 19:12, Henri Gomez wrote:
>>> 2010/1/8 Mark Thomas :
Could you do it again ?
2010/1/8 Mark Thomas :
> On 08/01/2010 19:12, Henri Gomez wrote:
>> 2010/1/8 Mark Thomas :
>>> On 08/01/2010 18:54, Costin Manolache wrote:
Yes. BTW - if you use maven, it'll download, build and test against tomcat6
jars ( since tomcat7 is not in maven ).
>>>
>>>
On 08/01/2010 19:12, Henri Gomez wrote:
> 2010/1/8 Mark Thomas :
>> On 08/01/2010 18:54, Costin Manolache wrote:
>>> Yes. BTW - if you use maven, it'll download, build and test against tomcat6
>>> jars ( since tomcat7 is not in maven ).
>>
>> It is a few months out of date but it is there. I was pl
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 08/01/2010 18:54, Costin Manolache wrote:
> > Yes. BTW - if you use maven, it'll download, build and test against
> tomcat6
> > jars ( since tomcat7 is not in maven ).
>
> It is a few months out of date but it is there. I was planning on
>
2010/1/8 Mark Thomas :
> On 08/01/2010 18:54, Costin Manolache wrote:
>> Yes. BTW - if you use maven, it'll download, build and test against tomcat6
>> jars ( since tomcat7 is not in maven ).
>
> It is a few months out of date but it is there. I was planning on
> another update when I get the EL st
Well, I'll take a look a Tomcat Lite and SPDY :)
And see what can be done
2010/1/8 Costin Manolache :
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>
>> >> Any comments on including the experimental SPDY support (
>> >> http://www.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-protocol ) ?
>> >> I know we had co
On 08/01/2010 18:54, Costin Manolache wrote:
> Yes. BTW - if you use maven, it'll download, build and test against tomcat6
> jars ( since tomcat7 is not in maven ).
It is a few months out of date but it is there. I was planning on
another update when I get the EL stuff fixed.
http://people.apache
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
> >> Any comments on including the experimental SPDY support (
> >> http://www.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-protocol ) ?
> >> I know we had countless debates on JK2 and http proxies, but some extra
> code
> >> to try out doesn't hurt :-)
> >
> > We nee
On 01/08/2010 11:15 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>>> Any comments on including the experimental SPDY support (
>>> http://www.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-protocol ) ?
>>> I know we had countless debates on JK2 and http proxies, but some extra code
>>> to try out doesn't hurt :-)
>>
>> We need a httpd module (
>> Any comments on including the experimental SPDY support (
>> http://www.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-protocol ) ?
>> I know we had countless debates on JK2 and http proxies, but some extra code
>> to try out doesn't hurt :-)
>
> We need a httpd module (like mod_proxy_ajp) for that :-)
mod_proxy_spdy
On 01/07/2010 05:50 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 06/01/2010 00:27, Costin Manolache wrote:
>>> Also, I would like to know if other comitters are OK with (temporarily -
>>> i.e. until the 7.0 release vote) including lite in the tomcat7 b
Le 7 janv. 2010 à 17:50, Costin Manolache a écrit :
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 06/01/2010 00:27, Costin Manolache wrote:
Also, I would like to know if other comitters are OK with
(temporarily -
i.e. until the 7.0 release vote) including lite in the tomcat7
b
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 06/01/2010 00:27, Costin Manolache wrote:
> > Also, I would like to know if other comitters are OK with (temporarily -
> > i.e. until the 7.0 release vote) including lite in the tomcat7 builds,
> > so people can try it out.
>
> How about ad
2010/1/6 Mark Thomas :
> On 06/01/2010 00:27, Costin Manolache wrote:
>> Also, I would like to know if other comitters are OK with (temporarily -
>> i.e. until the 7.0 release vote) including lite in the tomcat7 builds,
>> so people can try it out.
>
> How about adding it to the extras build? It co
+1 - I like the ideas
+0 - [Day job time constraints to help - but I'll look as I can]
-Tim
On 1/5/2010 7:27 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
Also, I would like to know if other comitters are OK with (temporarily -
i.e. until the 7.0 release vote) including lite in the tomcat7 builds,
so people can
On 06/01/2010 00:27, Costin Manolache wrote:
> Also, I would like to know if other comitters are OK with (temporarily -
> i.e. until the 7.0 release vote) including lite in the tomcat7 builds,
> so people can try it out.
How about adding it to the extras build? It could be included in the
release
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
> And what about some sort of OSGI glue
Thanks for volunteering :-).
Note that my goal is to _remove_ any framework feature from tomcat-lite -
leave just http and
services, no config file or class loading.
The current 'integration' interface se
And what about some sort of OSGI glue and Maven as build tool ?
2009/11/6 Costin Manolache :
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Tim Funk wrote:
>
>> I am intrigued by the idea and have similar constraints (kids+job).
>>
>> My longer term interest in lite was a simpler deployment and moving config
20 matches
Mail list logo
