On 21/03/2013 22:34, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 20/03/2013 20:55, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> I plan to get the most recent FileUpload changes (if any), run the unit
>> tests, run the TCKs and then tag 7.0.39 so that should happen some time
>> early tomorrow if all goes well.
>
> Second attempt.
>
> Unit
On 20/03/2013 20:55, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I plan to get the most recent FileUpload changes (if any), run the unit
> tests, run the TCKs and then tag 7.0.39 so that should happen some time
> early tomorrow if all goes well.
Second attempt.
Unit tests for 7.0.x/trunk both passed. Running the TCKs n
On 20/03/2013 20:58, Nick Williams wrote:
>
> On Mar 20, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> I plan to get the most recent FileUpload changes (if any), run the unit
>> tests, run the TCKs and then tag 7.0.39 so that should happen some time
>> early tomorrow if all goes well.
>>
>> Mark
>
>
On 20/03/2013 21:31, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2013/3/21 Mark Thomas :
>> I plan to get the most recent FileUpload changes (if any), run the unit
>> tests, run the TCKs and then tag 7.0.39 so that should happen some time
>> early tomorrow if all goes well.
>
> 1. There are some jdbc-pool bugs th
2013/3/21 Mark Thomas :
> I plan to get the most recent FileUpload changes (if any), run the unit
> tests, run the TCKs and then tag 7.0.39 so that should happen some time
> early tomorrow if all goes well.
1. There are some jdbc-pool bugs that are worth looking at
https://issues.apache.org/bugzil
On Mar 20, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I plan to get the most recent FileUpload changes (if any), run the unit
> tests, run the TCKs and then tag 7.0.39 so that should happen some time
> early tomorrow if all goes well.
>
> Mark
In 54734 I propose a patch that needs to also be back-p
