Re: Testing new website sync process

2009-09-18 Thread Mark Thomas
Henri Yandell wrote: > Did this go through Mark? No. It fell off my radar. I'll try and get back to it. I'll let floks know in advance before I change anything. > Where do I commit the Taglibs site? At the minute, the ideal would be as part of: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/site/trunk/

Re: Testing new website sync process

2009-09-17 Thread Henri Yandell
Did this go through Mark? Where do I commit the Taglibs site? Hen On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > Folks, > > As part of the response to the recent compromise of ASF servers [1] the > infrastructure team are introducing a new way to sync web sites from svn > and are looking

Re: Testing new website sync process

2009-09-03 Thread Ian Darwin
> I'd like to volunteer the Tomcat website. Any objections? I'm happy to > take on fixing any teething problems. > > ... > > My own view is that a staging site isn't necessary. Our site is simple. > We can test locally before committing and with commits affecting the > live site within a few seco

Re: Testing new website sync process

2009-09-03 Thread Henri Yandell
Generally +1. Noting that this includes the Taglibs subsites which are Maven based. Hen On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > Folks, > > As part of the response to the recent compromise of ASF servers [1] the > infrastructure team are introducing a new way to sync web sites from s

Re: Testing new website sync process

2009-09-03 Thread Rainer Jung
Go for it. Some remarks on the web site: 1) Tomcat connectors (JK) the docs are fully in svn, but only the xml/xslt part and the ant build support. The generated docs are at the moment not part of svn. Even if we put them in, we would need a way to decide, which version (tag) gets pushed. Simi

Re: Testing new website sync process

2009-09-03 Thread Mark Thomas
Tim Funk wrote: > Does that mean the entire site would be in svn? If so - would that also > mean that all documentation (like javadocs etc) would move into svn? Not sure. That is one of the things to be ironed out. That doesn't strike me as a particularly good idea but it might be necessary. It is

Re: Testing new website sync process

2009-09-03 Thread Tim Funk
Does that mean the entire site would be in svn? If so - would that also mean that all documentation (like javadocs etc) would move into svn? -Tim Mark Thomas wrote: Folks, As part of the response to the recent compromise of ASF servers [1] the infrastructure team are introducing a new way to