Re: Testing server SSL/TLS protocol and cipher support

Konstantin, On 10/21/14 2:18 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2014-10-21 21:55 GMT+04:00 Christopher Schultz : >> All, >> >> As part of my testing for the recent changes to Tomcat and tcnative, I >> wanted to use something like "sslscan", but that tool does not support >> anything above TLSv1. >> >

Re: Testing server SSL/TLS protocol and cipher support

2014-10-21 21:55 GMT+04:00 Christopher Schultz : > All, > > As part of my testing for the recent changes to Tomcat and tcnative, I > wanted to use something like "sslscan", but that tool does not support > anything above TLSv1. > > One can use OpenSSL s_client but that's fairly tedious. Here is a

Re: Testing Tomcat 6 Maven deploy

nice! 2012/6/21 Mark Thomas : > On 21/06/2012 11:30, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 21/06/2012 11:25, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: >>> 2012/6/21 Mark Thomas : On 21/06/2012 10:57, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 21/06/2012 10:31, Mark Thomas wrote: >> All, >> >> Just in case you happen to see

Re: Testing Tomcat 6 Maven deploy

2012/6/21 Mark Thomas : > On 21/06/2012 11:30, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 21/06/2012 11:25, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: >>> 2012/6/21 Mark Thomas : On 21/06/2012 10:57, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 21/06/2012 10:31, Mark Thomas wrote: >> All, >> >> Just in case you happen to see a 6.0.3

Re: Testing Tomcat 6 Maven deploy

On 21/06/2012 11:30, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 21/06/2012 11:25, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: >> 2012/6/21 Mark Thomas : >>> On 21/06/2012 10:57, Mark Thomas wrote: On 21/06/2012 10:31, Mark Thomas wrote: > All, > > Just in case you happen to see a 6.0.36 release staged on Nexus...

Re: Testing Tomcat 6 Maven deploy

On 21/06/2012 11:25, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2012/6/21 Mark Thomas : >> On 21/06/2012 10:57, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> On 21/06/2012 10:31, Mark Thomas wrote: All, Just in case you happen to see a 6.0.36 release staged on Nexus... I am migrating the Maven deploy scripts ch

Re: Testing Tomcat 6 Maven deploy

2012/6/21 Mark Thomas : > On 21/06/2012 10:57, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 21/06/2012 10:31, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> All, >>> >>> Just in case you happen to see a 6.0.36 release staged on Nexus... >>> >>> I am migrating the Maven deploy scripts changes in Tomcat 7 to Tomcat 6. >>> As part of this, I'll

Re: Testing Tomcat 6 Maven deploy

On 21/06/2012 10:57, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 21/06/2012 10:31, Mark Thomas wrote: >> All, >> >> Just in case you happen to see a 6.0.36 release staged on Nexus... >> >> I am migrating the Maven deploy scripts changes in Tomcat 7 to Tomcat 6. >> As part of this, I'll be doing a few deploys to Nexus

Re: Testing Tomcat 6 Maven deploy

On 21/06/2012 10:31, Mark Thomas wrote: > All, > > Just in case you happen to see a 6.0.36 release staged on Nexus... > > I am migrating the Maven deploy scripts changes in Tomcat 7 to Tomcat 6. > As part of this, I'll be doing a few deploys to Nexus to test things but > I'll be dropping them rat

Re: Testing Tomcat

This is off topic for this list. You will probably find better answers if you ask on the user list. That being said, I usually use JMeter for this type of testing personally. "Ohad Shacham" wrote in message news:aanlktingjaix88dxh_zkwpblco5j3wlo4u0psc-ff

Re: Testing new website sync process

Henri Yandell wrote: > Did this go through Mark? No. It fell off my radar. I'll try and get back to it. I'll let floks know in advance before I change anything. > Where do I commit the Taglibs site? At the minute, the ideal would be as part of: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/site/trunk/

Re: Testing new website sync process

Did this go through Mark? Where do I commit the Taglibs site? Hen On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > Folks, > > As part of the response to the recent compromise of ASF servers [1] the > infrastructure team are introducing a new way to sync web sites from svn > and are looking

Re: Testing new website sync process

> I'd like to volunteer the Tomcat website. Any objections? I'm happy to > take on fixing any teething problems. > > ... > > My own view is that a staging site isn't necessary. Our site is simple. > We can test locally before committing and with commits affecting the > live site within a few seco

Re: Testing new website sync process

Generally +1. Noting that this includes the Taglibs subsites which are Maven based. Hen On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > Folks, > > As part of the response to the recent compromise of ASF servers [1] the > infrastructure team are introducing a new way to sync web sites from s

Re: Testing new website sync process

Go for it. Some remarks on the web site: 1) Tomcat connectors (JK) the docs are fully in svn, but only the xml/xslt part and the ant build support. The generated docs are at the moment not part of svn. Even if we put them in, we would need a way to decide, which version (tag) gets pushed. Simi

Re: Testing new website sync process

Tim Funk wrote: > Does that mean the entire site would be in svn? If so - would that also > mean that all documentation (like javadocs etc) would move into svn? Not sure. That is one of the things to be ironed out. That doesn't strike me as a particularly good idea but it might be necessary. It is

Re: Testing new website sync process

Does that mean the entire site would be in svn? If so - would that also mean that all documentation (like javadocs etc) would move into svn? -Tim Mark Thomas wrote: Folks, As part of the response to the recent compromise of ASF servers [1] the infrastructure team are introducing a new way to

Re: Testing tarball mod_jk 1.2.28-dev available - please provide binaries

Rainer Jung wrote: On 06.03.2009 08:39, Mladen Turk wrote: Can you cc the dist files to your people's dir as well Did that: http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_jk-dev/ OK, I'll build the bins from there But as described above, it would be nice to first check BZ 46808 before building bi

Re: Testing tarball mod_jk 1.2.28-dev available - please provide binaries

On 06.03.2009 08:39, Mladen Turk wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: On 05.03.2009 15:23, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi, I uploaded testing tarballs of mod_jk 1.2.28-dev to http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/jk/source CAUTION: at this point in time the web server still shows the older revisio

Re: Testing tarball mod_jk 1.2.28-dev available - please provide binaries

Rainer Jung wrote: On 05.03.2009 15:23, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi, I uploaded testing tarballs of mod_jk 1.2.28-dev to http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/jk/source CAUTION: at this point in time the web server still shows the older revision 750390. The revision I uploaded last wa

Re: Testing tarball mod_jk 1.2.28-dev available - please provide binaries

On 05.03.2009 15:23, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi, I uploaded testing tarballs of mod_jk 1.2.28-dev to http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/jk/source CAUTION: at this point in time the web server still shows the older revision 750390. The revision I uploaded last was 750438. I already

Re: Testing Tomcat 6.0.0 alpha

On 10/27/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd rather start off right and do it in the Maven 2, not Maven 1, structure. The scripts I've seen are about equally easy... But let us know what you think after you double check, please. Answers from Maven developers on repository@ [1] in

Re: Testing Tomcat 6.0.0 alpha

On 10/26/06, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It would be good to test the build, and I'll post a stability vote for it next week (capped at beta, since some - very minor - test failures would need to be addressed first). ... The build itself has been mirrored correctly. So it has,

Re: Testing Tomcat 6.0.0 alpha

On 10/27/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I thought our internal repos weren't auto-sync'ed to ibiblio, which is why people at infra and [EMAIL PROTECTED] are having a discussion about Apache repo mirroring right now? Maybe I misunderstood. Under http://people.apache.org/repo/ we h

Re: Testing Tomcat 6.0.0 alpha

Hi, On 10/27/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There is a different upload process for Apache projects. We have internal repositories that are synced to ibiblio. I thought our internal repos weren't auto-sync'ed to ibiblio, which is why people at infra and [EMAIL PROTECTED] are havin

Re: Testing Tomcat 6.0.0 alpha

On 10/26/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Once we have a formal release (i.e. voted / approved by the PMC), we can also upload to ibiblio, aka the Maven Central Repository, following the directions at http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-ibiblio-upload.html There is a different

Re: Testing Tomcat 6.0.0 alpha

Remy Maucherat wrote: Yoav Shapira wrote: It's on people.apache.org, but I think it might still be hosed. The upload directions are at: http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html#maven-repo Once we have a formal release (i.e. voted / approved by the PMC), we can also upload to ibiblio,

Re: Testing Tomcat 6.0.0 alpha

Yoav Shapira wrote: It's on people.apache.org, but I think it might still be hosed. The upload directions are at: http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html#maven-repo Once we have a formal release (i.e. voted / approved by the PMC), we can also upload to ibiblio, aka the Maven Central R

Re: Testing Tomcat 6.0.0 alpha

Hi, On 10/26/06, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The d/l location will be: http://tomcat.apache.org/download-60.cgi The build itself has been mirrored correctly. Cool. Question: I don't remember where the Maven repository I should upload the build to is. Does someone know ? It'

Re: Testing

This is a question for the user list Filip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thnaks for your councils, but really to obtain this information (i.e The cookie JSESSIONID in the request is it always valid.) I mostly prefer asking it to Tomcat than to create a probably incomplete mechanism on Apache. (And p

Re: Testing

Thnaks for your councils, but really to obtain this information (i.e The cookie JSESSIONID in the request is it always valid.) I mostly prefer asking it to Tomcat than to create a probably incomplete mechanism on Apache. (And personnally I think that adding an interface to obtain an information al

Re: Testing

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Jean-frederic Clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I suppose the answer to my question will be no, but I need so much that I prefer to ask the question... Is it possible for an external program to test if a session e

Re: Testing

Quoting Jean-frederic Clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >I suppose the answer to my question will be no, but I need so much that I > prefer > >to ask the question... > > > >Is it possible for an external program to test if a session exists on the > server > >Tomc

Re: Testing

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I suppose the answer to my question will be no, but I need so much that I prefer to ask the question... Is it possible for an external program to test if a session exists on the server Tomcat? In fact, I am working on mod_jk and I would like to send a HTTP request