Re: Support RFC6265 cookie processing

2014-01-01 Thread Jeremy Boynes
I have experimented with how different desktop browsers handle cookie values, specifically with: * Aurora-28.0a2 * Chrome-31 * Firefox-26 * Internet Explorer-11 * Safari-7.0.1 on OS X 10.9 except for IE which was on Windows 7. This mail is a dump of things I found out and I will summarize conclus

Re: Support RFC6265 cookie processing

2013-12-27 Thread Jeremy Boynes
I think this is actually the principle that is the crux of the matter: > With respect to the > requirements of section 4.2, the Tomcat developers have always taken > the view that cookie headers should be treated as "combinations of > token, separators, and quoted-string" rather than "*TEXT" for th

Re: Support RFC6265 cookie processing

2013-12-24 Thread Mark Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 24/12/2013 01:21, Jeremy Boynes wrote: > In comments on issue #55917, there was suggestion for refactoring > cookie support along the lines described in RFC6265. No, that isn't what I said. What I said was that now might be a good time to refactor