Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I'll go ahead and plow forward if that is OK, and then we can disregard
it if it turns into crap.
I adopted this change, as it doesn't really seem possible to
differentiate events otherwise, so it doesn't look like crap to me at
the moment.
Rémy
-
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Can we split up SocketStatus.OPEN into
SocketStatus.OPEN_READ - for read events
SocketStatus.OPEN_WRITE - for write events
currently SocketStatus.OPEN is for READ events,
or if you have another suggestion to process data, let me know
It's
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Can we split up SocketStatus.OPEN into
SocketStatus.OPEN_READ - for read events
SocketStatus.OPEN_WRITE - for write events
currently SocketStatus.OPEN is for READ events,
or if you have another suggestion to process data, let me know
It's possible some new stat
