Do your results differ when Windows XP is used as the client?
I looked back at all our notes and though we tested with Solaris and
Windows servers the client was always XP.
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Jess,
I did some simple tests and was not able to reproduce your performance
observations. Nevert
Thanks for the efforts, Rainer.
I'll have to look deeper -- perhaps there is some aspect of our
configuration that is causing us the issues as they seem to be quite
repeatable.
--
Jess Holle
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Jess,
I did some simple tests and was not able to reproduce your performance
All in all I think that throughput for huge files is very good in both
cases. I would expect, that most often it would be much more intersting
to inspect scalability and system load (cpu/memory) for massive
concurrency. When serving large files, downloads will run a long time
because most often th
Hi Jess,
I did some simple tests and was not able to reproduce your performance
observations. Nevertheless I could observe a couple of strange things,
but I doubt, if they are relevant to most use cases.
First my setup:
Apache 2.0.59 worker with mod_jk 1.2.20 and Tomcat 5.5.17 with normal
(non-a
FWIW, this was also seen in less scientific testing from a linux system
to an XP client on the same 100Mbit network.
Andy
Jess Holle wrote:
Apache and tomcat are both on the same Solaris 10 box and the network
between client (XP) is 100Mbit.
--
Jess Holle
Rainer Jung wrote:
If noone finds
Mladen Turk wrote:
Jess Holle wrote:
> We're seeing a *serious *performance issue with mod_jk and large
(e.g. 500MB+) file transfers. [This is with Apache 2.0.55, Tomcat
5.0.30, and various recent mod_jk including 1.2.20.]
SunOS dev12.qa.atl.jboss.com 5.9 Generic_118558-25 sun4u sparc
SUNW,
Jess Holle wrote:
> We're seeing a *serious *performance issue with mod_jk and large (e.g.
500MB+) file transfers. [This is with Apache 2.0.55, Tomcat 5.0.30, and various
recent mod_jk including 1.2.20.]
SunOS dev12.qa.atl.jboss.com 5.9 Generic_118558-25 sun4u sparc
SUNW,Sun-Fire-V210
Tomcat
Apache and tomcat are both on the same Solaris 10 box and the network
between client (XP) is 100Mbit.
--
Jess Holle
Rainer Jung wrote:
If noone finds a reason for it, I can go into it during the weekend. I
would try to reproduce and research on Solaris. Concerning your data for
Solaris: Apache
If noone finds a reason for it, I can go into it during the weekend. I
would try to reproduce and research on Solaris. Concerning your data for
Solaris: Apache and Tomcat were both on Solaris? The same machine or
different? Network between Client (Browser?) and Apache was 100MBit or
1GBit?
Regards
