>
> Nope, will tag later today or over the weekend (depends on weather
> conditions :)
>
Ok, I'll grab a SVN copy for now.
On 02/24/2012 11:12 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
I just notice this 'release'
Did you release a source tarball ?
Nope, will tag later today or over the weekend (depends on weather conditions :)
Cheers
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-m
I just notice this 'release'
Did you release a source tarball ?
2012/2/23 Costin Manolache
> Thanks, I'll try it.
>
> Costin
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>
> > On 02/22/2012 07:22 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Mladen Turk wro
Thanks, I'll try it.
Costin
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 02/22/2012 07:22 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>
>>
>> I'm trying to provide a way for people to build "libtcnative-2.so" so it
>> can be installed on
>
On 02/22/2012 07:22 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
I'm trying to provide a way for people to build "libtcnative-2.so" so it
can be installed on
those systems along with the existing apr, openssl and libtcnative-1,
without requiring the installat
On 02/22/2012 07:22 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
However, not sure why you wish to do that. Many distros already provide
tomcat-native so there's no real point for doing that, especially since
we should not distribute unix binaries.
Yes, di
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 02/22/2012 05:47 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>
>> One thing I would appreciate help with: I would like to have an option to
>> statically link
>> openssl and apr into the tc-native
On 02/22/2012 05:47 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
One thing I would appreciate help with: I would like to have an option to
statically link
openssl and apr into the tc-native .so - I mean use openssl.a, apr.a.
You mean for unixes?
The solutio
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 02/22/2012 03:54 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>
>>>
Well I personally would not merge that into 1.1.x branch.
>>> It would be a bit weird to have 1.1.22 as is, and 1.1.23 with
On 02/22/2012 03:54 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Well I personally would not merge that into 1.1.x branch.
It would be a bit weird to have 1.1.22 as is, and 1.1.23 with
whole bunch of new features and API's.
That's not why we introduced bran
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 02/22/2012 06:17 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
>
>> Mladen: please let me know if you want to further review the change or
>> should I merge it to the branch.
>>
>>
> Well I personally would not merge that into 1.1.x branch.
> It would be a
On 02/22/2012 06:17 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
Mladen: please let me know if you want to further review the change or
should I merge it to the branch.
Well I personally would not merge that into 1.1.x branch.
It would be a bit weird to have 1.1.22 as is, and 1.1.23 with
whole bunch of new fea
Mladen: please let me know if you want to further review the change or
should I merge it to the branch.
I also noticed there are few other diffs - in particular the 'interrupt'
stuff in poll, few others.
Any plans to merge them too ? What's the plan with the trunk ?
Costin
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 a
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 02/21/2012 09:56 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Rainer Jung**
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 21.02.2012 21:30, Costin Manolache wrote:
>>>
>>> Is this going to be from head ? How can I get the NPN ( sslext.c )
On 02/21/2012 09:56 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Rainer Jungwrote:
On 21.02.2012 21:30, Costin Manolache wrote:
Is this going to be from head ? How can I get the NPN ( sslext.c )
included
?
Mladen is aiming for 1.1.23, so he will be releasing from the 1.1.x
Will do it tonight ( it's already in the trunk )
Costin
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 21.02.2012 21:56, Costin Manolache wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Rainer Jung**
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 21.02.2012 21:30, Costin Manolache wrote:
>>>
>>> Is this going to
On 21.02.2012 21:56, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Rainer Jungwrote:
On 21.02.2012 21:30, Costin Manolache wrote:
Is this going to be from head ? How can I get the NPN ( sslext.c )
included
?
AFAIR 1.1.x is CTR. So you just add it and try to not break 1.1 :)
If
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 21.02.2012 21:30, Costin Manolache wrote:
>
>> Is this going to be from head ? How can I get the NPN ( sslext.c )
>> included
>> ?
>>
>
> Mladen is aiming for 1.1.23, so he will be releasing from the 1.1.x branch.
>
What's the process for
On 21.02.2012 21:30, Costin Manolache wrote:
Is this going to be from head ? How can I get the NPN ( sslext.c ) included
?
Mladen is aiming for 1.1.23, so he will be releasing from the 1.1.x branch.
Regards,
Rainer
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 02/21/2012 06:05 P
Is this going to be from head ? How can I get the NPN ( sslext.c ) included
?
Costin
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 02/21/2012 06:05 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>
>> Mladen,
>>
>> On 2/21/12 11:30 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>
>>> We have couple of bugs fixed and its be
On 02/21/2012 06:05 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mladen,
On 2/21/12 11:30 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
We have couple of bugs fixed and its been quite a while since 1.1.22.
There is also few trivial bugs and patches in BZ which I plan to solve.
I volunteer as RM for 1.1.23.
Objections, comments?
Mladen,
On 2/21/12 11:30 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> We have couple of bugs fixed and its been quite a while since 1.1.22.
> There is also few trivial bugs and patches in BZ which I plan to solve.
> I volunteer as RM for 1.1.23.
>
> Objections, comments?
I'd certainly like a release: the first rele
22 matches
Mail list logo
