Re: Proxied client IP logging

2005-12-16 Thread Filip Hanik - Mailing Lists
if you have two proxy servers, very common, the X-Forwarded-For becomes a comma separated list of IP addresses Shankar Unni wrote: Tim Funk wrote: 2) X-Forwarded-For (IIRC) can be multi-valued (comma seperated via multiple proxies) Plus, other load balancers seem to stick in other headers

Re: Proxied client IP logging

2005-12-14 Thread Shankar Unni
Tim Funk wrote: 2) X-Forwarded-For (IIRC) can be multi-valued (comma seperated via multiple proxies) Plus, other load balancers seem to stick in other headers, too (e.g. "X-Real-IP"). (These two seem to be the most popular). It'll be an interesting job to figure out the "real" IP address i

Re: Proxied client IP logging

2005-12-14 Thread Phil Shaw
On 14 Dec 2005, at 11:12, Tim Funk wrote: > I'm not really interested in this patch for a few reasons: > 1) The functionality is available via a custom pattern Okay, I wasn't aware of that. This was a hack that fixed an immediate requirement for me. I don't use it any longer myself, so I'll drop

Re: Proxied client IP logging

2005-12-14 Thread Tim Funk
I'm not really interested in this patch for a few reasons: 1) The functionality is available via a custom pattern 2) X-Forwarded-For (IIRC) can be multi-valued (comma seperated via multiple proxies) 3) X-Forwarded - This can break existing implementations for clients which are sending X-Forwarde

Re: Proxied client IP logging

2005-12-14 Thread Sriram N
--- Phil Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hope this may be useful. If you need a more formal assignment to > Apache, please let me know. > You should post to the Tomcat Bugzilla. That's the best mechanism for submitting patches. > Best regards, > > Phil > -- Sriram __