On 01/05/2010 12:38 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 05/01/2010 17:41, David Jencks wrote:
On Jan 4, 2010, at 2:56 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
One thing that isn't clear to me is whether the requirement is for an
extension point for web application related instances (ie things that in
a J2EE envi
On 05/01/2010 17:41, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Jan 4, 2010, at 2:56 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> One thing that isn't clear to me is whether the requirement is for an
>> extension point for web application related instances (ie things that in
>> a J2EE environment would be bundled in the WAR) or for
I've uploaded a couple patches to https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48414
with a new newSystemInstance method. I'm not sure why this doesn't
need to be in a protected block like much of the code that creates
objects for the app, but the original code wasn't in such a block s
On Jan 4, 2010, at 2:56 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 04/01/2010 02:46, Tim Whittington wrote:
No need to re-post. A ping would have sufficed.
We've experienced similar issues integrating lots of third party
libraries (Tomcat being one of them) into our OSGi runtime.
Thanks for your input.
On 04/01/2010 02:46, Tim Whittington wrote:
>
No need to re-post. A ping would have sufficed.
> We've experienced similar issues integrating lots of third party libraries
> (Tomcat being one of them) into our OSGi runtime.
Thanks for your input. I can't speak for the other Tomcat committers but
cat Developers List"
Sent: Friday, 25 December, 2009 11:27:09 AM GMT +12:00 New Zealand
Subject: Re: Problem loading classes with Class.forName() in
StandardContext.createWrapper()
I'd like to encourage a little more discussion on this topic. Mark
commented on the bugzilla entry to
cat Developers List"
Sent: Friday, 25 December, 2009 11:27:09 AM GMT +12:00 New Zealand
Subject: Re: Problem loading classes with Class.forName() in
StandardContext.createWrapper()
I'd like to encourage a little more discussion on this topic. Mark
commented on the bugzilla entry to
I'd like to encourage a little more discussion on this topic. Mark
commented on the bugzilla entry to the effect, IIUC, that he thought
this was a geronimo problem. I did some more experimentation and I'm
pretty sure it has nothing to do with geronimo specifically, but
relates to how Cla
