On Sep 7, 2010, at 10:36 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 07/09/2010 15:15, sebb wrote:
>> On 4 September 2010 21:06, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sep 4, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
A more complete solution could be adding geronimo-javamail and
geronimo-activation to dow
On 07/09/2010 15:40, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 07.09.2010 16:36, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 07/09/2010 15:15, sebb wrote:
>>> On 4 September 2010 21:06, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 4, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> A more complete solution could be adding geronimo-javamail
On 07.09.2010 16:36, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 07/09/2010 15:15, sebb wrote:
On 4 September 2010 21:06, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 4, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
A more complete solution could be adding geronimo-javamail and
geronimo-activation to download and compile as standard dep
On 07/09/2010 15:15, sebb wrote:
> On 4 September 2010 21:06, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 4, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>>>
>>> A more complete solution could be adding geronimo-javamail and
>>> geronimo-activation to download and compile as standard dependencies. Just
>>> an ide
On 4 September 2010 21:06, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Sep 4, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>>
>> A more complete solution could be adding geronimo-javamail and
>> geronimo-activation to download and compile as standard dependencies. Just
>> an idea, I never used or tested this though but
On Sep 4, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> A more complete solution could be adding geronimo-javamail and
> geronimo-activation to download and compile as standard dependencies. Just an
> idea, I never used or tested this though but recently noticed an analogous
> discussion about Java
On 04.09.2010 18:28, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 4, 2010, at 12:10 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 4, 2010, at 11:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 4, 2010, at 5:52 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Jim,
On 03.09.2010 21:20, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The prelim builds can be found at:
htt
On Sep 4, 2010, at 12:28 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Anyone have any problems if I simply fix the build setup
> to download and build those jars if full.dist is set...?
> In addition to that change and the updating of BUILDING.txt,
> we should hopefully have a repeatable build...
>
> Those chan
On Sep 4, 2010, at 12:10 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Sep 4, 2010, at 11:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 4, 2010, at 5:52 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jim,
>>>
>>> On 03.09.2010 21:20, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The prelim builds can be found at:
http://people.
On Sep 4, 2010, at 11:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Sep 4, 2010, at 5:52 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> On 03.09.2010 21:20, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> The prelim builds can be found at:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
>>>
>>> I will call for an official v
On Sep 4, 2010, at 5:52 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> On 03.09.2010 21:20, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> The prelim builds can be found at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
>>
>> I will call for an official vote early next week...
>
> The mail factory classes are still mi
Hi Jim,
On 03.09.2010 21:20, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The prelim builds can be found at:
http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
I will call for an official vote early next week...
The mail factory classes are still missing, cf. BZ 49647 for details.
I guess you don't have activation.
12 matches
Mail list logo