Re: Late Binding

2013-11-15 Thread Suresh Mathew
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Suresh Mathew wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Konstantin Kolinko < > knst.koli...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 2013/11/11 Suresh Mathew : >> > Got it Konstantin, Thank you... But stopping and starting would mean >> that >> > we spend time in between and

Re: Late Binding

2013-11-11 Thread Suresh Mathew
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2013/11/11 Suresh Mathew : > > Got it Konstantin, Thank you... But stopping and starting would mean that > > we spend time in between and wont be able to instance switch?. > > > > >>You meant s/instance/instant/ ? > > I meant instant.

Re: Late Binding

2013-11-11 Thread Suresh Mathew
On 11/11/2013 04:35, Suresh Mathew wrote: > Hi Mark, > Thank you very much for the response. Sounds good. Would the init be > also initializing the app?. >>No. The Containers would start normally. It would just be the the >>connector(s) that had to be started later. I agree, Let me try the co

Re: Late Binding

2013-11-11 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2013/11/11 Suresh Mathew : > Got it Konstantin, Thank you... But stopping and starting would mean that > we spend time in between and wont be able to instance switch?. > You meant s/instance/instant/ ? Starting from a new connector and starting a previously stopped connector needs exactly the sam

Re: Late Binding

2013-11-11 Thread Mark Thomas
On 11/11/2013 04:35, Suresh Mathew wrote: > Hi Mark, > Thank you very much for the response. Sounds good. Would the init be > also initializing the app?. No. The Containers would start normally. It would just be the the connector(s) that had to be started later. > Because we want the bind(sta

Re: Late Binding

2013-11-10 Thread Suresh Mathew
Got it Konstantin, Thank you... But stopping and starting would mean that we spend time in between and wont be able to instance switch?. Thanks Suresh On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2013/11/8 Suresh Mathew : > > All, > > Can we add a new state to bind the port aft

Re: Late Binding

2013-11-10 Thread Suresh Mathew
Hi Mark, Thank you very much for the response. Sounds good. Would the init be also initializing the app?. Because we want the bind(start in this scenario) to be as small as possible. Thanks Suresh On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 08/11/2013 04:18, Suresh Mathew w

Re: Late Binding

2013-11-08 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2013/11/8 Suresh Mathew : > All, > Can we add a new state to bind the port after the startup is completed. > > Right now start will start the app after binding to the port. We can delay > the binf after connector is started using bindOnInit. But this is a little > different. > > StartOnly - Start

Re: Late Binding

2013-11-08 Thread Mark Thomas
On 08/11/2013 04:18, Suresh Mathew wrote: > All, > Can we add a new state to bind the port after the startup is completed. > > Right now start will start the app after binding to the port. We can delay > the binf after connector is started using bindOnInit. But this is a little > different. > >