Re: JK and AJP protocol enhancements

2006-07-13 Thread Jean-frederic Clere
Henri Gomez wrote: Well there was some provision in mind in AJP 1.4 : Context informations forwarding for Servlet engine to Web Server With this kind of information requested by webserver, we could determine the version of Servlet AJP implementation and as such use 32/64k buffers. the jk cou

Re: JK and AJP protocol enhancements

2006-07-13 Thread Henri Gomez
Well there was some provision in mind in AJP 1.4 : Context informations forwarding for Servlet engine to Web Server With this kind of information requested by webserver, we could determine the version of Servlet AJP implementation and as such use 32/64k buffers. the jk could send question like

Re: JK and AJP protocol enhancements

2006-07-10 Thread Mladen Turk
Costin Manolache wrote: What's the status with mod_proxy ? It seems this kind of change would break backward compatibility, and if this happens - maybe it's better to fix the protocol marshalling limitations or change it completely. I hate the idea of patching an old and mostly broken marshall

Re: JK and AJP protocol enhancements

2006-07-10 Thread Jean-frederic Clere
Mladen Turk wrote: You see how desperate I am when writing this on Sunday :) Was it too hot on the sea side? Anyhow, we are pretty close to the new JK release that I hope will be the most usable and stable whatsoever. The things we agreed so many times before, but having obviously too litt

Re: JK and AJP protocol enhancements

2006-07-10 Thread Jean-frederic Clere
Costin Manolache wrote: What's the status with mod_proxy ? I think Mladen idea is to make the same enhancements in mod_proxy (and I will try to help him :-) It seems this kind of change would break backward compatibility, and if this happens - maybe it's better to fix the protocol marsha

Re: JK and AJP protocol enhancements

2006-07-09 Thread Bill Barker
"Mladen Turk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > You see how desperate I am when writing this on Sunday :) > > Anyhow, we are pretty close to the new JK release that I > hope will be the most usable and stable whatsoever. > > The things we agreed so many times before, b

Re: JK and AJP protocol enhancements

2006-07-09 Thread Costin Manolache
What's the status with mod_proxy ? It seems this kind of change would break backward compatibility, and if this happens - maybe it's better to fix the protocol marshalling limitations or change it completely. I hate the idea of patching an old and mostly broken marshalling model. The only thing

Re: JK and AJP protocol enhancements

2006-07-09 Thread Jess Holle
Mladen Turk wrote: You see how desperate I am when writing this on Sunday :) Anyhow, we are pretty close to the new JK release that I hope will be the most usable and stable whatsoever. The things we agreed so many times before, but having obviously too little resources to actually create are t