Re: Git and tomcat 7.x

2011-10-15 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2011/10/15 Rainer Jung : > On 14.10.2011 20:19, Francis Galiegue wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 20:08, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> On 14/10/2011 19:00, Francis Galiegue wrote: [...] The trouble is that I don't feel like git svn cloning directly given that my bandwidth is very poor and

Re: Git and tomcat 7.x

2011-10-15 Thread Rainer Jung
On 14.10.2011 20:19, Francis Galiegue wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 20:08, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 14/10/2011 19:00, Francis Galiegue wrote: >>> [...] The trouble is >>> that I don't feel like git svn cloning directly given that my >>> bandwidth is very poor and the Apache SVN repo has a numbe

Re: Git and tomcat 7.x

2011-10-14 Thread Francis Galiegue
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 20:08, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 14/10/2011 19:00, Francis Galiegue wrote: >> [...] The trouble is >> that I don't feel like git svn cloning directly given that my >> bandwidth is very poor and the Apache SVN repo has a number of commits >> in the 7 digit range (even if the f

Re: Git and tomcat 7.x

2011-10-14 Thread Mark Thomas
On 14/10/2011 19:00, Francis Galiegue wrote: > Hello, > > I have lost the discussion, but remember one thing having been > discussed today about the git repo for tomcat 7.x being broken because > its trunk followed 8.0-dev instead (I did notice that but thought it > was on purpose). > > Do 8.0.x