Mark,
On 10/7/21 11:46, Mark Thomas wrote:
Hi,
As you will have seen from the 8.5.72 release vote and/or bug 65599
there is an issue with 8.5.x, Java 17 and ECJ.
In short:
- the Java EE 7 spec requires that Tomcat 8.5.x runs on Java 7
- Tomcat 8.5.x ships with ECJ 4.6.3, the newest version t
пт, 8 окт. 2021 г. в 11:18, Mark Thomas :
>
> On 07/10/2021 20:59, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> > чт, 7 окт. 2021 г. в 18:46, Mark Thomas :
>
>
>
> >> Is this a problem worth solving? If it is, is there a better way?
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > Last few days I was thinking of the following approaches:
>
>
On 07/10/2021 20:59, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
чт, 7 окт. 2021 г. в 18:46, Mark Thomas :
Is this a problem worth solving? If it is, is there a better way?
Hi!
Last few days I was thinking of the following approaches:
I view users having to explicitly make a choice as a disadvantage ra
чт, 7 окт. 2021 г. в 22:59, Konstantin Kolinko :
> чт, 7 окт. 2021 г. в 18:46, Mark Thomas :
> >
> Approach e)
> Combine ecj-4.6.3.jar and ecj-4.20.jar (or later) into a single
> multi-release jar, "ecj-4.3.6_and_4.20.jar".
> See
> https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/238
>
> I mean that
> - The META-INF/
чт, 7 окт. 2021 г. в 18:46, Mark Thomas :
>
> Hi,
>
> As you will have seen from the 8.5.72 release vote and/or bug 65599
> there is an issue with 8.5.x, Java 17 and ECJ.
>
> In short:
> - the Java EE 7 spec requires that Tomcat 8.5.x runs on Java 7
> - Tomcat 8.5.x ships with ECJ 4.6.3, the newest