On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 08:43 -0700, Costin Manolache wrote:
> But I hope you agree you were right, at least in the long term :-)
Who cares about the long term, nobody uses 10 years old code. Oh,
wait ;)
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 07:57 -0700, Costin Manolache wrote:
> > I remember many years back I was arguing in favor of DirContext - pro
> > arguments were
> > "it's a standard", bundled in JDK, probably more target implementations
> will
> > b
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 10/15/2010 04:57 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
>
>> Are you going to replace DirContext ?
>>
>> If yes - great, but please first send a quick summary comparing your API
>> with the other VFS
>> around in apache. I think commons has few target
On 10/15/2010 04:57 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
Are you going to replace DirContext ?
If yes - great, but please first send a quick summary comparing your API
with the other VFS
around in apache. I think commons has few targets, including a hdfs, I
remember there are more.
Well it's not a VFS
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 07:57 -0700, Costin Manolache wrote:
> I remember many years back I was arguing in favor of DirContext - pro
> arguments were
> "it's a standard", bundled in JDK, probably more target implementations will
> be available, etc.
> I think Remy was arguing that it's too complex an
Are you going to replace DirContext ?
If yes - great, but please first send a quick summary comparing your API
with the other VFS
around in apache. I think commons has few targets, including a hdfs, I
remember there are more.
If no - not sure what's the point of replacing java.io impl, I assume y
I remembered Mladen and VFS discussion, elsewhere.
Google confirmed it to me :
http://www.mail-archive.com/commons-...@jakarta.apache.org/msg82888.html
Your code is still http://apvfs.sourceforge.net/ ?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
2010/10/15 Mladen Turk :
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm working for quite some time on the light-weight
> VFS layer (with the java.io.* as the only provider at
> the moment) to be used as the Tomcat's physical file
> system access. The ultimate goal is to be able to run
> the Tomcat on top of things like Hadoop o
On 10/15/2010 09:58 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 15/10/2010 08:02, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
I'm working for quite some time on the light-weight
VFS layer (with the java.io.* as the only provider at
the moment) to be used as the Tomcat's physical file
system access. The ultimate goal is to be able to
On 15/10/2010 08:02, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working for quite some time on the light-weight
> VFS layer (with the java.io.* as the only provider at
> the moment) to be used as the Tomcat's physical file
> system access. The ultimate goal is to be able to run
> the Tomcat on top of things
10 matches
Mail list logo
