Re: Cookie issues

2009-11-13 Thread Mark Thomas
Remy Maucherat wrote: > On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 16:03 -0500, Mark Thomas wrote: >> I've done some more digging and I think I have found what was causing this. >> I'll >> have a fix for trunk shortly and (after some testing) I'll re-propose. > > No, what I meant is that, if you want to go the strict

Re: Cookie issues

2009-11-12 Thread Remy Maucherat
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 16:03 -0500, Mark Thomas wrote: > I've done some more digging and I think I have found what was causing this. > I'll > have a fix for trunk shortly and (after some testing) I'll re-propose. No, what I meant is that, if you want to go the strict route and use '/' as a separat

Re: Cookie issues

2009-11-12 Thread Mark Thomas
Mark Thomas wrote: > Remy Maucherat wrote: >> On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 16:45 -0500, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> I really do loath cookies right now. I've pulled the proposed patches for >>> 5.5.x >>> and 6.0.x until I (or someone else) can take a look at this. >> I do too. v0 cookies is 15 years old stuff

Re: Cookie issues

2009-11-12 Thread Mark Thomas
Remy Maucherat wrote: > On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 16:45 -0500, Mark Thomas wrote: >> I really do loath cookies right now. I've pulled the proposed patches for >> 5.5.x >> and 6.0.x until I (or someone else) can take a look at this. > > I do too. v0 cookies is 15 years old stuff that Netscape hacked o

Re: Cookie issues

2009-11-11 Thread Remy Maucherat
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 16:45 -0500, Mark Thomas wrote: > I really do loath cookies right now. I've pulled the proposed patches for > 5.5.x > and 6.0.x until I (or someone else) can take a look at this. I do too. v0 cookies is 15 years old stuff that Netscape hacked out of thin air without thinking

Re: Cookie issues

2009-11-11 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
On 11/11/2009 02:45 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I think cookies are still broken, and this is getting more and more complex. The apparent issue is that the parser applies v1 parsing rules when parsing v0 cookies (which are generated using a much more lenient character e

Re: Cookie issues

2009-11-11 Thread Mark Thomas
Remy Maucherat wrote: > Hi, > > I think cookies are still broken, and this is getting more and more > complex. The apparent issue is that the parser applies v1 parsing rules > when parsing v0 cookies (which are generated using a much more lenient > character exclusion), resulting in cookies that c