Opps,
you are right! After a long night and two much test setups...
Peter
Am 13.04.2007 um 12:14 schrieb Remy Maucherat:
Peter Rossbach wrote:
I also see the APR JMX memory leak with following APR Connector
config
minSpareThreads="150"
maxSpareThrea
Peter Rossbach wrote:
I also see the APR JMX memory leak with following APR Connector config
minSpareThreads="150"
maxSpareThreads="150"
maxThreads="150"
I don't think there's a leak in that connector. For starters
minSpareThreads and m
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
The memory leak exists in the APR and JIO connector, when and only when
they use the shared and the Executor has a
minSpareThreads
I know that, I was planning to adapt your patch.
Rémy
-
To uns
Hi,
I also see the APR JMX memory leak with following APR Connector config
protocol="org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11AprProtocol"/>
pollerSize="1024" />
Regards
Peter Roßbach
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am 13.04.2007 um 06:26 schrieb Filip H
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
much appreciated, I'm still working on the "deregistering" of the JMX
resources, somehow they are slipping through the cracks
Originally, the purpose of the JMX stuff was to provide thread
monitoring. Now that the processors are not tied to
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
much appreciated, I'm still working on the "deregistering" of the JMX
resources, somehow they are slipping through the cracks
Originally, the purpose of the JMX stuff was to provide thread
monitoring. Now that the processors are not tied to threads anymore, it
b
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Yoav Shapira wrote:
After playing with these candidate binaries for just an hour or so,
things look good to me.
Yes, they seem fine. Most likely however, I won't propose a vote on
them, as I would prefer picking up the NIO fixes with a 6.0.12 tag.
much appreciated, I'm s
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 18:13 +0200, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Yoav Shapira wrote:
> > After playing with these candidate binaries for just an hour or so,
> > things look good to me.
>
> Yes, they seem fine. Most likely however, I won't propose a vote on
> them, as I would prefer picking up the NIO f
+1
Peter
Am 12.04.2007 um 18:13 schrieb Remy Maucherat:
Yoav Shapira wrote:
After playing with these candidate binaries for just an hour or so,
things look good to me.
Yes, they seem fine. Most likely however, I won't propose a vote on
them, as I would prefer picking up the NIO fixes wit
Yoav Shapira wrote:
After playing with these candidate binaries for just an hour or so,
things look good to me.
Yes, they seem fine. Most likely however, I won't propose a vote on
them, as I would prefer picking up the NIO fixes with a 6.0.12 tag.
Rémy
--
After playing with these candidate binaries for just an hour or so,
things look good to me.
Yoav
On 4/11/07, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Candidate binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.11/
Rémy
-
11 matches
Mail list logo
