Re: CI, Java 17 and Javadoc

2023-01-12 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 3:03 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > > On 12/01/2023 13:41, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 1:19 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > >> > >> I tried switching the CI over to use Java 17 last night. This exposed an > >> unexpected Javadoc behaviour that is currently breaking

Re: CI, Java 17 and Javadoc

2023-01-12 Thread Christopher Schultz
Mark, On 1/12/23 07:19, Mark Thomas wrote: I tried switching the CI over to use Java 17 last night. This exposed an unexpected Javadoc behaviour that is currently breaking the 9.0.x and 8.5.x builds. Ant is configured to run Javadoc with failonwarning="true" When running the Javadoc task wit

Re: CI, Java 17 and Javadoc

2023-01-12 Thread Mark Thomas
On 12/01/2023 13:41, Rémy Maucherat wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 1:19 PM Mark Thomas wrote: I tried switching the CI over to use Java 17 last night. This exposed an unexpected Javadoc behaviour that is currently breaking the 9.0.x and 8.5.x builds. Ant is configured to run Javadoc with fail

Re: CI, Java 17 and Javadoc

2023-01-12 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 1:19 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > > I tried switching the CI over to use Java 17 last night. This exposed an > unexpected Javadoc behaviour that is currently breaking the 9.0.x and > 8.5.x builds. > > Ant is configured to run Javadoc with failonwarning="true" > > When running th

Re: CI is back

2019-07-19 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
пт, 19 июл. 2019 г. в 13:20, Rainer Jung : > > I have the same problem (Java version needed for TLS based downloads) > here for TC 7 and decided to split my build scripts in a download phase > using higher Java and the build phase using minimal Java. I think we > should use our java.7.home property

Re: CI is back

2019-07-19 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 19.07.2019 um 13:22 schrieb Rémy Maucherat: On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 12:20 PM Rainer Jung > wrote: I have the same problem (Java version needed for TLS based downloads) here for TC 7 and decided to split my build scripts in a download phase using hig

Re: CI is back

2019-07-19 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 19/07/2019 à 13:20, Rémy Maucherat a écrit : > But we want to build an installer for Windows using it. Does that > actually work with your Linux package ? Yes it does. At work I build all my NSIS Windows installers from a CI server running on Debian. Emmanuel Bourg --

Re: CI is back

2019-07-19 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 19.07.2019 um 13:20 schrieb Rémy Maucherat: On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 12:05 PM Emmanuel Bourg > wrote: Le 16/07/2019 à 10:39, Mark Thomas a écrit : > On July 15, 2019 11:08:22 PM UTC, "Rémy Maucherat" mailto:r...@apache.org>> wrote: > > That is b

Re: CI is back

2019-07-19 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 12:20 PM Rainer Jung wrote: > I have the same problem (Java version needed for TLS based downloads) > here for TC 7 and decided to split my build scripts in a download phase > using higher Java and the build phase using minimal Java. I think we > should use our java.7.home

Re: CI is back

2019-07-19 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 12:05 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 16/07/2019 à 10:39, Mark Thomas a écrit : > > On July 15, 2019 11:08:22 PM UTC, "Rémy Maucherat" > wrote: > > > > That is by design. NSIS 3.x wasn't compatible with the version of WINE > available on the CI server. That might have chang

Re: CI is back

2019-07-19 Thread Rainer Jung
I have the same problem (Java version needed for TLS based downloads) here for TC 7 and decided to split my build scripts in a download phase using higher Java and the build phase using minimal Java. I think we should use our java.7.home property for the download steps. For TC 7 I currently ru

Re: CI is back

2019-07-19 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 16/07/2019 à 10:39, Mark Thomas a écrit : > On July 15, 2019 11:08:22 PM UTC, "Rémy Maucherat" wrote: > > That is by design. NSIS 3.x wasn't compatible with the version of WINE > available on the CI server. That might have changed with the OS upgrade. > > From memory (I only have my phone an

Re: CI is back

2019-07-19 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 11:10 PM Rémy Maucherat wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:56 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > >> We need to ask infra to add wine to the list of packages installed on >> that box. That will need an INFRA jira ticket. >> > > Ok. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18759

Re: CI is back

2019-07-16 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:56 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > We need to ask infra to add wine to the list of packages installed on that > box. That will need an INFRA jira ticket. > Ok. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18759 Rémy

Re: CI is back

2019-07-16 Thread Mark Thomas
On July 16, 2019 7:28:45 PM UTC, "Rémy Maucherat" wrote: >On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 5:51 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > >> On July 16, 2019 1:17:15 PM UTC, "Rémy Maucherat" >wrote: >> >On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:39 AM Mark Thomas >wrote: >> > >> >> On July 15, 2019 11:08:22 PM UTC, "Rémy Maucherat" > >>

Re: CI is back

2019-07-16 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 5:51 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > On July 16, 2019 1:17:15 PM UTC, "Rémy Maucherat" wrote: > >On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:39 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > > > >> On July 15, 2019 11:08:22 PM UTC, "Rémy Maucherat" > >> wrote: > >> >Hi, > >> > > >> >It seems CI is back up :) Great ne

Re: CI is back

2019-07-16 Thread Mark Thomas
On July 16, 2019 1:17:15 PM UTC, "Rémy Maucherat" wrote: >On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:39 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > >> On July 15, 2019 11:08:22 PM UTC, "Rémy Maucherat" >> wrote: >> >Hi, >> > >> >It seems CI is back up :) Great news ! >> > >> >However, there's something odd with the build: >> > >>

Re: CI is back

2019-07-16 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:39 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > On July 15, 2019 11:08:22 PM UTC, "Rémy Maucherat" > wrote: > >Hi, > > > >It seems CI is back up :) Great news ! > > > >However, there's something odd with the build: > > > https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/4485/steps/compile

Re: CI is back

2019-07-16 Thread Mark Thomas
On July 15, 2019 11:08:22 PM UTC, "Rémy Maucherat" wrote: >Hi, > >It seems CI is back up :) Great news ! > >However, there's something odd with the build: >https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/4485/steps/compile/logs/stdio >It's downloading NSIS 2.51 while it should be using 3.04. CI

Re: CI

2014-04-18 Thread Rémy Maucherat
2014-04-17 14:40 GMT+02:00 Martin Grigorov : > Hi, > > There are failed disks with BuildBot's master server (hostname: aegis). > pctony (infra guy) said that they have ordered new ones and they will > replace them today (US time ?!). > > Thanks for the info, but it looks like it is still dead. Ré

Re: CI

2014-04-17 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, There are failed disks with BuildBot's master server (hostname: aegis). pctony (infra guy) said that they have ordered new ones and they will replace them today (US time ?!). Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > Hi, > > I'