On 30/01/2025 16:04, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 4:35 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
On 30/01/2025 11:20, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 12:10 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
On 30/01/2025 10:32, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
Yes, there's an off by one issue, still don't understand
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 4:35 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> On 30/01/2025 11:20, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 12:10 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
> >>
> >> On 30/01/2025 10:32, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> >>> Yes, there's an off by one issue, still don't understand what's
> >>> causing it (an
On 30/01/2025 11:20, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 12:10 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
On 30/01/2025 10:32, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
Yes, there's an off by one issue, still don't understand what's
causing it (anything that gets into the available = 0 situations in
available() will break)
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 12:10 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> On 30/01/2025 10:32, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> > Yes, there's an off by one issue, still don't understand what's
> > causing it (anything that gets into the available = 0 situations in
> > available() will break). My local code replaces the CRL
On 30/01/2025 10:32, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
Yes, there's an off by one issue, still don't understand what's
causing it (anything that gets into the available = 0 situations in
available() will break). My local code replaces the CRLF trick with
proper byte skipping and does not have the issue. I'll
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 11:21 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> On 30/01/2025 09:36, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 12:26 AM wrote:
> >>
> >> Build status: BUILD FAILED: failed compile (failure)
> >> Worker used: bb_worker2_ubuntu
> >> URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/112/builds/1
On 30/01/2025 09:36, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 12:26 AM wrote:
Build status: BUILD FAILED: failed compile (failure)
Worker used: bb_worker2_ubuntu
URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/112/builds/1490
Blamelist: remm
Build Text: failed compile (failure)
Status Detected: ne
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 12:26 AM wrote:
>
> Build status: BUILD FAILED: failed compile (failure)
> Worker used: bb_worker2_ubuntu
> URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/112/builds/1490
> Blamelist: remm
> Build Text: failed compile (failure)
> Status Detected: new failure
> Build Source Stamp: [
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024, 01:32 Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 12/06/2024 01:46, Igal Sapir wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 5:32 PM wrote:
> >
> >> Build status: BUILD FAILED: failed Snapshot deployed to ASF Maven
> snapshot
> >> repository (failure)
> >> Worker used: bb_worker2_ubuntu
> >> URL: https:/
On 12/06/2024 01:46, Igal Sapir wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 5:32 PM wrote:
Build status: BUILD FAILED: failed Snapshot deployed to ASF Maven snapshot
repository (failure)
Worker used: bb_worker2_ubuntu
URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/112/builds/1130
Blamelist: Igal Sapir
Build Text:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 5:32 PM wrote:
> Build status: BUILD FAILED: failed Snapshot deployed to ASF Maven snapshot
> repository (failure)
> Worker used: bb_worker2_ubuntu
> URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/112/builds/1130
> Blamelist: Igal Sapir
> Build Text: failed Snapshot deployed to AS
This is my fault. The fix for BZ 68119 is bad. I have the corrections
locally. I'm just double checking everything.
Mark
On 27/11/2023 15:06, build...@apache.org wrote:
Build status: BUILD FAILED: failed compile (failure)
Worker used: bb_worker2_ubuntu
URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/1
On 24/10/2023 22:13, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
It's running on Java 22 now, there's a red warning at the top in the
-release-java-check target otherwise. The check can be flipped back to
fail if there's no Java 22 when trying a release (because the build
would be incomplete).
The OpenSSL tests with
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 10:00 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> On 24/10/2023 12:34, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > On 24/10/2023 10:04, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 10:51 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
> >>>
> >>> This was triggered by the switch to Java 22.
> >>>
> >>> I'm going to need to update
On 24/10/2023 12:34, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 24/10/2023 10:04, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 10:51 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
This was triggered by the switch to Java 22.
I'm going to need to update the CI. The Tomcat 11 builds are going to
fail until I get that done.
That was not
On 24/10/2023 10:04, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 10:51 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
This was triggered by the switch to Java 22.
I'm going to need to update the CI. The Tomcat 11 builds are going to
fail until I get that done.
That was not intended, I simply forgot this CI was us
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 10:51 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> This was triggered by the switch to Java 22.
>
> I'm going to need to update the CI. The Tomcat 11 builds are going to
> fail until I get that done.
That was not intended, I simply forgot this CI was using the release
target (the github one
This was triggered by the switch to Java 22.
I'm going to need to update the CI. The Tomcat 11 builds are going to
fail until I get that done.
Mark
On 24/10/2023 09:45, build...@apache.org wrote:
Build status: BUILD FAILED: failed compile (failure)
Worker used: bb_worker2_ubuntu
URL: https:
6 Oct 2023 08:41:59 Rémy Maucherat :
On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 12:50 PM wrote:
Build status: BUILD FAILED: failed compile (failure)
Worker used: bb_worker2_ubuntu
URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/112/builds/659
Blamelist: Mark Thomas
Build Text: failed compile (failure)
Status Detected: ne
On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 12:50 PM wrote:
>
> Build status: BUILD FAILED: failed compile (failure)
> Worker used: bb_worker2_ubuntu
> URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/112/builds/659
> Blamelist: Mark Thomas
> Build Text: failed compile (failure)
> Status Detected: new failure
> Build Source Sta
This is my fault. I know what I did wrong - I missed one case in the fix
for BZ 66841. Working on a fix now...
Mark
On 04/08/2023 16:51, build...@apache.org wrote:
Build status: BUILD FAILED: failed compile (failure)
Worker used: bb_worker2_ubuntu
URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/112/bui
This was an APR crash on shutdown. I've see a couple of these recently
but haven't spotted a pattern. Nor have they bee frequent enough to be
repeatable.
Mark
On 27/07/2023 17:11, build...@apache.org wrote:
Build status: BUILD FAILED: failed compile (failure)
Worker used: bb_worker2_ubuntu
U
Sorry about this.
I thought I ran the tests locally before committing the redirect changes
but obviously not. Trying to figure out the root cause of the failure now...
Mark
On 14/03/2023 15:04, build...@apache.org wrote:
Build status: BUILD FAILED: failed compile (failure)
Worker used: bb_wo
On 12/01/2023 22:16, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 12/01/2023 20:01, build...@apache.org wrote:
Build status: BUILD FAILED: failed compile (failure)
Worker used: bb2_worker2_ubuntu
URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/112/builds/115
Blamelist: Mark Thomas
Build Text: failed compile (failure)
Status De
On 12/01/2023 20:01, build...@apache.org wrote:
Build status: BUILD FAILED: failed compile (failure)
Worker used: bb2_worker2_ubuntu
URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/112/builds/115
Blamelist: Mark Thomas
Build Text: failed compile (failure)
Status Detected: new failure
Build Source Stamp: [
25 matches
Mail list logo
