On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:20 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> On 16/05/2024 11:17, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > On 16/05/2024 10:34, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 10:57 AM wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Build status: BUILD FAILED: failed compile (failure)
> >>> Worker used: bb_worker2_ubuntu
> >>> U
On 16/05/2024 11:17, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 16/05/2024 10:34, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 10:57 AM wrote:
Build status: BUILD FAILED: failed compile (failure)
Worker used: bb_worker2_ubuntu
URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/44/builds/1265
Blamelist: remm
Build Text: fail
On 16/05/2024 10:34, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 10:57 AM wrote:
Build status: BUILD FAILED: failed compile (failure)
Worker used: bb_worker2_ubuntu
URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/44/builds/1265
Blamelist: remm
Build Text: failed compile (failure)
Status Detected: new
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 10:57 AM wrote:
>
> Build status: BUILD FAILED: failed compile (failure)
> Worker used: bb_worker2_ubuntu
> URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/44/builds/1265
> Blamelist: remm
> Build Text: failed compile (failure)
> Status Detected: new failure
> Build Source Stamp: [b
This looks to be a valid failure.
https://nightlies.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-10.1.x/logs/882/TEST-org.apache.coyote.http2.TestRfc9218.NIO.txt
I'm looking into it.
Mark
On 27/07/2023 17:56, build...@apache.org wrote:
Build status: BUILD FAILED: failed compile (failure)
Worker used: bb_worker
FYI, this was a failure to receive a response from
https://jakarta.ee/specifications/platform/10/apidocs/
Nothing to see here. Move along...
Mark
On 22/03/2023 18:42, build...@apache.org wrote:
Build status: BUILD FAILED: compile (failure)
Worker used: bb_worker2_ubuntu
URL: https://ci2.apac
