Re: Bayeux implementation

2007-06-08 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
here is a summary of what needs to be done 1. The basic Java API that we want to work around is http://fisheye.codehaus.org/browse/jetty-contrib/jetty/trunk/contrib/cometd/src/main/java/dojox/cometd 2. Implement a JSON parser in Java, or grab another one, 3. Implement the API in step 1) using

Re: Bayeux implementation

2007-06-08 Thread Remy Maucherat
Peter Rossbach wrote: OK, really the current "spec doc" is strange, but it's good enough to start discussions. Please, let us start talks with other Bayeux folks. I don't like the syntax much more than the "spec doc" (lol, not ready yet for the IETF, I guess), but it's an implementation deta

Re: Bayeux implementation

2007-06-08 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Peter Rossbach wrote: Hi Filip, Great, I think it is a good time to start talking about Bayeux /dojo as a standard comet protocol. The current different Async/comet server API's make it very strong to start for most programmers. I review the Jetty Bayeux implementation and find it very usefu

Re: Bayeux implementation

2007-06-08 Thread Peter Rossbach
Hi Filip, Great, I think it is a good time to start talking about Bayeux /dojo as a standard comet protocol. The current different Async/comet server API's make it very strong to start for most programmers. I review the Jetty Bayeux implementation and find it very useful. OK, really the cu

Re: Bayeux implementation

2007-06-07 Thread Remy Maucherat
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: If the spec is bad, then its another reason for us to join in, but the fact that there is a client support, speaks for itself. Specifically, the syntax looks funny to me, and the spec document is bad (that's what I meant with "the spec is bad"). Implementing it d

Re: Bayeux implementation

2007-06-07 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Remy Maucherat wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: yo, I was gonna create a Bayeux implementation for Tomcat, I am thinking it might be good for us to work with the Jetty and Glassfish folks to use the same org.dojox interfaces. I don't like dependencies ;) I am not interested in working wi

Re: Bayeux implementation

2007-06-07 Thread Remy Maucherat
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: yo, I was gonna create a Bayeux implementation for Tomcat, I am thinking it might be good for us to work with the Jetty and Glassfish folks to use the same org.dojox interfaces. I don't like dependencies ;) I am not interested in working with these two projects,

Re: Bayeux implementation

2007-06-07 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Yoav Shapira wrote: Hey, On 6/7/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: yo, I was gonna create a Bayeux implementation for Tomcat, I am thinking it might be good for us to work with the Jetty and Glassfish folks to use the same org.dojox interfaces. I like the idea! Question:

Re: Bayeux implementation

2007-06-07 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hey, On 6/7/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: yo, I was gonna create a Bayeux implementation for Tomcat, I am thinking it might be good for us to work with the Jetty and Glassfish folks to use the same org.dojox interfaces. I like the idea! Question: Where should I do th