On 05/08/2010 11:38, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 04.08.2010 22:47, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> I'm happy to see all of this configuration completely re-written if that
>> is what is required. That said, this is just a start-up optimisation.
>>
>> I think we need three groups:
>> a) never scan (JAR or TLD)
>>
On 04.08.2010 22:47, Mark Thomas wrote:
I'm happy to see all of this configuration completely re-written if that
is what is required. That said, this is just a start-up optimisation.
I think we need three groups:
a) never scan (JAR or TLD)
b) default jarsToSkip
c) default noTldJar
I'd suggest a
On 04/08/2010 12:54, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> would it make sense to make jarsToSkip publicly available in the
> JarScanner interface and default impl, in order to allow to configure it
> per context as part of context.xml?
+1
> Is there one JarScanner instance per context?
Yes.
