On 14/01/2011 15:20, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> The valve already implements AccessLog interface.
> If we can turn AccessLogValve#invoke() into noop (pass-through) and
> let the connector to provide us with logging via the #log(..) method,
> I think that won't break compatibility.
Neat. I have a
Mark,
On 1/14/2011 9:40 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> c) Refactor the access logging. I don't have a clear picture of what
> this might look like but I am thinking along the lines of:
> - log to JULI rather than manage files in the access log
-1
I think access logging is something where all configur
2011/1/14 Mark Thomas :
> The fix for bug 50496 [1] (response sizes in access log valve ignored
> compression) was implemented by forcing the response to be flushed all
> the way to the socket so the access log valve can get an accurate byte
> count from the connector.
>
> This has a number of cons
