I created a prototype of moving to javax.el as a potential fix for bug 33934:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26179&action=edit
This would allow us to split into three jars:
* standard-impl, with the 1.2 TLDs that would support 1.2 and 1.1 tags
* standard-compat, with
On Oct 7, 2010, at 11:15 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
...
>> A further refinement would be to refactor the 1.0 code to use the JSP EL
>> support from javax.el.
>>
>
>
> 1.0 code? That would preclude its use unless javax.el is provided.
To cla
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> The 1.0 taglibs included their own implementation of EL. With EL now being
> provided by the JSP container and newer code using the 1.1 tag URIs, this is
> complexity that would not be needed for many newer implementation.
>
> I've been wond
