Mark,
On 11/17/15 3:44 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 17/11/2015 20:34, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> Mark,
>>
>> On 11/17/15 3:24 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> The votes cast were as follows:
>>>
>>> Binding:
>>> +1: remm, markt, mgrigorov
>>
>> Also +1 : schultz, not that it really matters.
>
> Sorry
On 17/11/2015 20:34, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Mark,
>
> On 11/17/15 3:24 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> The votes cast were as follows:
>>
>> Binding:
>> +1: remm, markt, mgrigorov
>
> Also +1 : schultz, not that it really matters.
Sorry. Not sure how I missed that.
Mark
>
>> Non-binding:
>> +
Mark,
On 11/17/15 3:24 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The votes cast were as follows:
>
> Binding:
> +1: remm, markt, mgrigorov
Also +1 : schultz, not that it really matters.
> Non-binding:
> +1: ognjen
>
> The vote therefore passes. 9.0.0.M1 will be released with an alpha label
>
> Thanks to every
The votes cast were as follows:
Binding:
+1: remm, markt, mgrigorov
Non-binding:
+1: ognjen
The vote therefore passes. 9.0.0.M1 will be released with an alpha label
Thanks to everyone for the testing.
Mark
On 13/11/2015 00:12, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 release
