Re: [Proposal] Resurrecting storeconfig

2013-02-05 Thread Remy Maucherat
On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 19:27 +0900, Keiichi Fujino wrote: > Hi. > > I do not understand about StoreConfig well, but I have a question. > > As long as I read the code (r1442161), I think that storeconfig() seem > to trigger a redeployment of Web applications. > For example, new context.xml will be

Re: [Proposal] Resurrecting storeconfig

2013-02-05 Thread Keiichi Fujino
Hi. I do not understand about StoreConfig well, but I have a question. As long as I read the code (r1442161), I think that storeconfig() seem to trigger a redeployment of Web applications. For example, new context.xml will be created when testApp/META-INF/context.xml is stored. And redeployment o

Re: [Proposal] Resurrecting storeconfig

2013-02-04 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 02/01/2013 09:47 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote: On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 17:26 +, Mark Thomas wrote: One issue I'm wondering about is the build system. After all that time, I've starting using Maven instead of Ant (unbelievable, I know ...), and while I am fine continuing using existing Ant build

Re: [Proposal] Resurrecting storeconfig

2013-02-01 Thread Remy Maucherat
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 17:26 +, Mark Thomas wrote: > > One issue I'm wondering about is the build system. After all that time, > > I've starting using Maven instead of Ant (unbelievable, I know ...), and > > while I am fine continuing using existing Ant build systems, I find > > adding ones to n

Re: [Proposal] Resurrecting storeconfig

2012-12-14 Thread Remy Maucherat
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 17:26 +, Mark Thomas wrote: > > The proposal would be to move "storeconfig7/trunk" from the sandbox to > > "modules/storeconfig" in the Tomcat 7 branch [a port to trunk, aka > > Tomcat "8", would be coming shortly, since I believe its container API > > would now start to b

Re: [Proposal] Resurrecting storeconfig

2012-12-14 Thread Mark Thomas
On 14/12/2012 13:36, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Hi, > > I would be willing to start maintaining again storeconfig, along with > Jean-Frédéric. Nice. That is a really useful feature. Great to see it (and you) back. > So after a hiatus, we would be able to bring back this > functionality which allows