On 07/07/2009, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> > As was written early in this my thread:
> >
> http://www.nabble.com/Coding-Guidelines%2C-encodings%2C-keywords-td23662661.html
> > (http://markmail.org/thread/d6dsgrsfvnuzclt7)
> >
> > there are problems with Subversion $Date$
Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> As was written early in this my thread:
> http://www.nabble.com/Coding-Guidelines%2C-encodings%2C-keywords-td23662661.html
> (http://markmail.org/thread/d6dsgrsfvnuzclt7)
>
> there are problems with Subversion $Date$ keyword:
> 1. It uses localized names for the month a
On 07.07.2009 04:34, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Rainer Jung wrote:
>> So I like the idea of using Id, but I am open to arguments for dropping it.
>
> In httpd, we use; in the reference
> file, and the tag which
> is updated in order to determine how far out of sync translations have fallen.
>
Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> So I like the idea of using Id, but I am open to arguments for dropping it.
In httpd, we use; in the reference
file, and the tag which
is updated in order to determine how far out of sync translations have fallen.
So there is one argument for at least one embedded svn pr
On 07.07.2009 02:01, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> As was written early in this my thread:
> http://www.nabble.com/Coding-Guidelines%2C-encodings%2C-keywords-td23662661.html
> (http://markmail.org/thread/d6dsgrsfvnuzclt7)
>
> there are problems with Subversion $Date$ keyword:
> 1. It uses localized
