2016-04-18 4:40 GMT+03:00 Bill Barker :
> To whom it may engage...
>
> This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
> more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
> and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
>
> Project tomcat-trunk-validate has an iss
2015-10-22 6:25 GMT+03:00 Bill Barker :
>
> To whom it may engage...
>
> This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
> more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
> and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
>
> Project tomcat-trunk-validate has an i
Sorry, fixed by r1620532 (trailing space introduced by me in changelog).
Am 26.08.2014 um 07:53 schrieb Bill Barker:
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk a
On 18/06/2012 09:27, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> I am OK to disable the validation for this file, but I I think it
> would be better to unwrap the first line of those values. It will be a
> bit more ugly but it will avoid problems if there is someone whose
> editor is configured to auto-trim the li
2012/6/18 Bill Barker :
> - tomcat-trunk-validate : Tomcat 8.x, a web server implementing Java
> Servlet 3.1,
>
> validate:
> [mkdir] Created dir:
> /srv/gump/public/workspace/tomcat-trunk/output/res/checkstyle
> [checkstyle] Running Checkstyle 5.6-SNAPSHOT on 2282 files
> [checkstyle]
>
2012/5/27 Bill Barker :
>
> Project tomcat-trunk-validate has an issue affecting its community
> integration.
> This issue affects 1 projects,
> and has been outstanding for 2 runs.
> The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Build Failed'.
> For reference only, the following pr
We have finally gotten Gump in sync with Google, so these are legitimate
errors now.
"Bill Barker" wrote in message
news:20120407042542.1283a14f...@vmgump.apache.org...
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http
This should be fixed now. The problem was that checkstyle still uses the
deprecated google-collections, and Gump uses the Guava collection classes to
build this project. But Guava changed their build structure recently. I
should have caught up Gump to using the same structure as Guava is using,
2012/1/19 Konstantin Kolinko :
> 2012/1/19 Bill Barker :
>> To whom it may engage...
>>
>> This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
>> more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
>> and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
>>
>> Project tomcat-t
2012/1/19 Bill Barker :
> To whom it may engage...
>
> This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
> more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
> and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
>
> Project tomcat-trunk-validate has an issue affecting its
On 29/12/2011 07:49, Brian Burch wrote:
> On 29/12/11 15:50, Bill Barker wrote:
>>
>
> Thanks for looking at the two errors for me, Bill. It was hard to see
> your comments because the formatting of your reply appeared mangled when
> I received it. I have snipped out everything except the importan
On 29/12/11 15:50, Bill Barker wrote:
Thanks for looking at the two errors for me, Bill. It was hard to see
your comments because the formatting of your reply appeared mangled when
I received it. I have snipped out everything except the important bits
below...
"Brian Burch" wrote in mes
"Brian Burch" wrote in message news:4efbea99.1020...@pingtoo.com...
On 28/12/11 14:40, Bill Barker wrote:
To whom it may engage...
This caught my attention, but I am puzzled (see details below).
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit ht
On 28/12/11 14:40, Bill Barker wrote:
To whom it may engage...
This caught my attention, but I am puzzled (see details below).
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gum
2011/9/26 Bill Barker
> [checkstyle] Running Checkstyle 5.5-SNAPSHOT on 2069 files
> [checkstyle]
> /srv/gump/public/workspace/tomcat-trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/fileupload/util/Streams.java:179:59:
> Got an exception - expecting '5', found '0'
> [checkstyle]
> /srv/gump/public/works
I recently updated checkstyle configuration in Tomcat trunk:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1150644
The configuration is
Apparently checkstyle used by Gump does see the first "excludes"
property and fails.
This works with checkstyle 5.3 and 5.4
16 matches
Mail list logo
