Re: [GSoC] Regarding JSR 196 implementation project idea

2010-03-22 Thread Rajeev Sampath
Thanks Jean-Frederic for your clarification. I'll look into this one as well. Regards, Rajeev On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:47 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > On 03/22/2010 05:40 AM, Rajeev Sampath wrote: > > Thanks Mark for your reply. > > > > Though it's not mandatory, if it's going to be usef

Re: [GSoC] Regarding JSR 196 implementation project idea

2010-03-22 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 03/22/2010 05:40 AM, Rajeev Sampath wrote: > Thanks Mark for your reply. > > Though it's not mandatory, if it's going to be useful, then I'll continue > working on it and prepare a proposal. > > The other idea which seemed to be interesting is the one on implementing a > connector to support S

Re: [GSoC] Regarding JSR 196 implementation project idea

2010-03-21 Thread Rajeev Sampath
Thanks Mark for your reply. Though it's not mandatory, if it's going to be useful, then I'll continue working on it and prepare a proposal. The other idea which seemed to be interesting is the one on implementing a connector to support SPDY protocol [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMDEV-

Re: [GSoC] Regarding JSR 196 implementation project idea

2010-03-21 Thread Mark Thomas
On 21/03/2010 14:36, Rajeev Sampath wrote: > Hello, > > I'm interested in the project idea on implementing JSR 196 specification for > Tomcat. I've used Tomcat for some time, but as I'm not very much familiar > with its internals or JSR 196 spec, I'm in the process of getting > familiarized with t