Re: [DISCUSS] MessageBytes refactoring

2022-08-24 Thread Han Li
> 2022年8月24日 16:16,Mark Thomas 写道: > > On 24/08/2022 09:08, Rémy Maucherat wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 10:43 PM Mark Thomas wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I've been looking at a fix for bug 66196. My ideas so far have revolved >>> around MessageBytes but the solutions are being made mo

Re: [DISCUSS] MessageBytes refactoring

2022-08-24 Thread Mark Thomas
On 24/08/2022 09:08, Rémy Maucherat wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 10:43 PM Mark Thomas wrote: Hi all, I've been looking at a fix for bug 66196. My ideas so far have revolved around MessageBytes but the solutions are being made more complex by the current behaviour of MessageBytes in some cas

Re: [DISCUSS] MessageBytes refactoring

2022-08-24 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 10:43 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've been looking at a fix for bug 66196. My ideas so far have revolved > around MessageBytes but the solutions are being made more complex by the > current behaviour of MessageBytes in some cases. > > For example (I'm using strin