On 23/11/2011 08:19, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 23.11.2011 08:14, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2011/11/23 Mark Thomas:
>>> I have done a little bit of digging on this as the current 7.0.x trunk
>>> fails frequently enough on my windows box that I can repeat the failure
>>> often enough.
>>>
>>> I have
On 23.11.2011 08:14, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/11/23 Mark Thomas:
I have done a little bit of digging on this as the current 7.0.x trunk
fails frequently enough on my windows box that I can repeat the failure
often enough.
I have got as far as discovering that the request.getAvailable() te
2011/11/23 Mark Thomas :
> I have done a little bit of digging on this as the current 7.0.x trunk
> fails frequently enough on my windows box that I can repeat the failure
> often enough.
>
> I have got as far as discovering that the request.getAvailable() test on
> line 308 of the CoyoteAdapter re
I have done a little bit of digging on this as the current 7.0.x trunk
fails frequently enough on my windows box that I can repeat the failure
often enough.
I have got as far as discovering that the request.getAvailable() test on
line 308 of the CoyoteAdapter returns zero whenever the test fails.