RE: FW: Delays in mod_jk

2007-11-28 Thread Larry Reisler
Yes, you said it before Rainer...thanks for your help as always. Larry -Original Message- From: Rainer Jung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 12:51 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: FW: Delays in mod_jk Larry Reisler wrote: > Agreed, the root ca

Re: FW: Delays in mod_jk

2007-11-28 Thread Rainer Jung
] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 10:21 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Cc: Rainer Jung; Larry Reisler Subject: Re: FW: Delays in mod_jk Larry Reisler wrote: Rainer -- I recently changed replaced the version of JBOSS Web we were using to JBOSSWEB_2_0_0_GA_CP04. It included several patches to

RE: FW: Delays in mod_jk

2007-11-28 Thread Larry Reisler
two seconds. Larry -Original Message- From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 10:21 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Cc: Rainer Jung; Larry Reisler Subject: Re: FW: Delays in mod_jk Larry Reisler wrote: > Rainer -- > > I recentl

Re: FW: Delays in mod_jk

2007-11-28 Thread Mladen Turk
jean-frederic clere wrote: JBPAPP-366 is http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=589062&view=rev that was a bug in the JAVA part not in mod_jk. Right, however the idea to call the Socket.shutdown in a separate thread is very good since it's blocking call. The only problem is how to close bunch of th

Re: FW: Delays in mod_jk

2007-11-28 Thread jean-frederic clere
Larry Reisler wrote: > Rainer -- > > I recently changed replaced the version of JBOSS Web we were using to > JBOSSWEB_2_0_0_GA_CP04. It included several patches to the AJP code. That > appears to have solved the problem. The FIN packets from the back end come > back immediately now. I'm gue