From: Rainer Jung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I think we agree, that DirectoryIndex should not replace the
> welcome-file list on the Tomcat side.
>
> This means at least: if non of the entries in the DirectoryIndex list is
> visible by Apache, it should not try to prepend any of them to the
I think we agree, that DirectoryIndex should not replace the
welcome-file list on the Tomcat side.
This means at least: if non of the entries in the DirectoryIndex list is
visible by Apache, it should not try to prepend any of them to the URL
and send to Tomcat, even if this would match a JkMo
> Look, I don't wish to go into discussion with you, because
> you obviously already have your perspective (IMHO wrong).
?!?! Well, of corse I have mine...
> >> Static content delivery by Apache requires thorough application
> >> design so that it can be served outside the application itself.
>
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Any other 'better' integration would probably require patching
Apache core, and thats IMHO unfeasible by majority of users.
Which one? Checking the 404 response? If mod_jk adopts sub-requests to Tomcat,
why should Apache get patched?
Or if you mean the JkMount direct
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> >
> > Finally, it seems to me that mod_jk doesn't map a request to
> tomcat as a sub-request, but instead seems to tweek the req->main
> field, which may probably create the kind of problems reported in
> BZ 36121. I'
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Finally, it seems to me that mod_jk doesn't map a request to tomcat as a sub-request, but
instead seems to tweek the req->main field, which may probably create the kind of
problems reported in BZ 36121. I'm not an expert of the apache req structure nor of the
mod_jk
> Hi,
>
> I want to find out how to correctly fix BZ 41430 and 36121. They have to
> do with the way mod_dir and mod_jk interact. Before fixing the code I
> find it necessary to define the correct behaviour, which seems to be
> non-trivial.
>
> The behaviour needs to be described depending on Dir
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Mladen,
Things like DirectoryIndex are completely
useless and further more breaks the security,
because the Tomcat must serve the default content.
I simply don't understand, what this means functionally, i.e. how
DirectoryIndex and ForwardDirectories should work with mo
Hi Mladen,
Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi,
I want to find out how to correctly fix BZ 41430 and 36121. They have
to do with the way mod_dir and mod_jk interact. Before fixing the code
I find it necessary to define the correct behaviour, which seems to be
non-trivial.
It is ver
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi,
I want to find out how to correctly fix BZ 41430 and 36121. They have to
do with the way mod_dir and mod_jk interact. Before fixing the code I
find it necessary to define the correct behaviour, which seems to be
non-trivial.
It is very trivial.
The mod_jk is proxy t
10 matches
Mail list logo
