Re: [Update] Quality check mod_jk 1.2.19-dev

2006-08-30 Thread Jim Jagielski
Compiling in maintainer-mode I see (for jk_util.c and jk_worker.c): jk_lb_worker.h:106: warning: 'lb_locking_type' defined but not used jk_lb_worker.h:113: warning: 'lb_method_type' defined but not used jk_lb_worker.h:121: warning: 'lb_state_type' defined but not used jk_lb_worker.h:131:

Re: Quality check mod_jk 1.2.19-dev

2006-08-30 Thread Jim Jagielski
I meant what is the output of 'ls -l usr/sbin/apxs2-worker' ? :) On Aug 29, 2006, at 4:12 AM, Henri Gomez wrote: What does 'ls -l usr/sbin/apxs2-worker' say? On Suse Linux distribution, rpm packager provide one apxs by MPM model. apxs2-worker is for worker mode, apxs2-prefork for prefor

Re: [Update] Quality check mod_jk 1.2.19-dev

2006-08-30 Thread Mladen Turk
Rainer Jung wrote: Hi all, Mladen and I applied some minor but partly important fixes. The result is available from trunk, but also as a tarball from http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_jk-1.2.19-438031/ There is one problem(?) with apache 1.3/Win32. With Apache 1.3.34 logging is fine, but wi

[Update] Quality check mod_jk 1.2.19-dev

2006-08-29 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi all, Mladen and I applied some minor but partly important fixes. The result is available from trunk, but also as a tarball from http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_jk-1.2.19-438031/ Under this URL you can also find the docs (no changes form previous quality check). Feel free to send any obse

Re: Quality check mod_jk 1.2.19-dev

2006-08-29 Thread Rainer Jung
If no one stops me, I'll do so at in 30 minutes :) Henri Gomez schrieb: > 2006/8/29, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> Henri Gomez wrote: >> > >> > BTW, a windows binary will be usefull also >> > >> >> http://people.apache.org/~mturk/jk1219/ >> >> Done some bug fixes to be able to compile, >>

Re: Quality check mod_jk 1.2.19-dev

2006-08-29 Thread Henri Gomez
2006/8/29, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Henri Gomez wrote: > > BTW, a windows binary will be usefull also > http://people.apache.org/~mturk/jk1219/ Done some bug fixes to be able to compile, so they are in sync with trunk. Thanks. BTW, what about releasing a new tarball including this

Re: Quality check mod_jk 1.2.19-dev

2006-08-29 Thread Henri Gomez
What does 'ls -l usr/sbin/apxs2-worker' say? On Suse Linux distribution, rpm packager provide one apxs by MPM model. apxs2-worker is for worker mode, apxs2-prefork for prefork mode; Cheers

Re: Quality check mod_jk 1.2.19-dev

2006-08-29 Thread Mladen Turk
Henri Gomez wrote: BTW, a windows binary will be usefull also http://people.apache.org/~mturk/jk1219/ Done some bug fixes to be able to compile, so they are in sync with trunk. Regards, Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [E

Re: Quality check mod_jk 1.2.19-dev

2006-08-28 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Aug 28, 2006, at 4:22 AM, Henri Gomez wrote: Build problem on SUSE SLES 9 PPC (Linux LPAR on an i5/OS) powerpc32 ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs2-worker checking for setsockopt in -lsocket... no checking whether to use SO_RCVTIMEO with setsockopt()... yes checking whether to u

Re: Quality check mod_jk 1.2.19-dev

2006-08-28 Thread Rainer Jung
Mladen Turk wrote: You can put tarball inside your http://people.apache.org/~rjung/ It's much easier to handle tarball then doing svn co for each platform. Somehow I don't get the problem: the tarball was already on people.apache.org when I sent the original message. It's in the directory I

Re: Quality check mod_jk 1.2.19-dev

2006-08-28 Thread Mladen Turk
Rainer Jung wrote: I don't want to make it available under /dev/dist, since it's a little early. If a couple of people give a little feedback, I would feel more comfortable. You can put tarball inside your http://people.apache.org/~rjung/ It's much easier to handle tarball then doing svn c

Re: Quality check mod_jk 1.2.19-dev

2006-08-28 Thread Henri Gomez
Well /usr/sbin/apxs2-worker -q PREFIX didn't works (tried previously) and got : :~/tomcat-connectors-1.2.19-437488-src/native # /usr/sbin/apxs2-worker -q PREFIX apxs:Error: /usr/sbin/httpd2-worker not found or not executable. It works with apxs2-prefork : :~/tomcat-connectors-1.2.19-437

Re: Quality check mod_jk 1.2.19-dev

2006-08-28 Thread Rainer Jung
Mladen Turk wrote: Rainer, can you make some tomcat-connectors-1.2.19-dev.tar.gz? Regards, Mladen. Hi Mladen, isn't that what's under http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_jk-1.2.19-437488/ The numver is the subversion revision. The contents are 1.2.19-dev with everything like in the release

Re: Quality check mod_jk 1.2.19-dev

2006-08-28 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi Henri, there were no changes in configure between 1.2.18 and 1.2.19. The message occurs, if /usr/sbin/apxs2-worker -q PREFIX doesn't work. Could you please try that? I used the version on Solaris Sparc and 32Bit and 64Bit Linux and it seems very strange to me, that there should be a prob

Re: Quality check mod_jk 1.2.19-dev

2006-08-28 Thread Henri Gomez
Build problem on SUSE SLES 9 PPC (Linux LPAR on an i5/OS) powerpc32 ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs2-worker checking for setsockopt in -lsocket... no checking whether to use SO_RCVTIMEO with setsockopt()... yes checking whether to use SO_SNDTIMEO with setsockopt()... yes need to che

Re: Quality check mod_jk 1.2.19-dev

2006-08-28 Thread Mladen Turk
Henri Gomez wrote: I'll make a build on our Linux PPC box and make some tests. Stay tuned BTW, a windows binary will be usefull also I'll made them later today. Rainer, can you make some tomcat-connectors-1.2.19-dev.tar.gz? Regards, Mladen. -

Re: Quality check mod_jk 1.2.19-dev

2006-08-28 Thread Henri Gomez
I'll make a build on our Linux PPC box and make some tests. Stay tuned BTW, a windows binary will be usefull also 2006/8/28, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi all, I applied some bigger changes to mod_jk. The result is available from trunk, but also from http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mo

Quality check mod_jk 1.2.19-dev

2006-08-27 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi all, I applied some bigger changes to mod_jk. The result is available from trunk, but also from http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_jk-1.2.19-437488/ Under this URL you can also find the updated docs. Since we need to decide, if we release Mladens Windows fixes from a branch (not includi