Re: Proposed plan for Tomcat 10

On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 7:12 PM Christopher Schultz < ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > > > On 12/16/19 11:45, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 5:38 PM Mark Thomas > > wrote: > > > > On 16/12/2019

Re: Proposed plan for Tomcat 10

On 17/12/2019 18:12, Christopher Schultz wrote: > How about end-users? I could imagine this tool being useful to migrate > an *application* from Tomcat [789].x to Tomcat 10 (or 9.10). I'm expecting end-users to be the primary users of this tool. A little further down the road I can see us askin

Re: Proposed plan for Tomcat 10

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/16/19 11:45, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 5:38 PM Mark Thomas > wrote: > > On 16/12/2019 15:37, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > > > >> Do you plan to create the 9.10 branch at the same time ? If you >>

Re: Proposed plan for Tomcat 10

On 16/12/2019 16:45, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 5:38 PM Mark Thomas > > I was thinking about that tool and the possibilities, but not sure > about > > the location. There's always the "modules" ... > > I thought about that. It just seems a bit more stand-alon

Re: Proposed plan for Tomcat 10

On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 4:03 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > Hi, > > First of all an update. > > I have a first pass of the javax.* -> jakarta.* migration tool > implemented. I have used it to convert the JSTL JARs used by Tomcat's > example web application and by the unit tests. The unit tests now all >

Re: Proposed plan for Tomcat 10

On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 5:38 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > On 16/12/2019 15:37, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > > > > > Do you plan to create the 9.10 branch at the same time ? If you don't > > create it immediately to keep it in sync with 10, it would need to be > > recreated later using a jakarta->javax ren

Re: Proposed plan for Tomcat 10

On 16/12/2019 15:37, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > Do you plan to create the 9.10 branch at the same time ? If you don't > create it immediately to keep it in sync with 10, it would need to be > recreated later using a jakarta->javax rename. I was planning on creating it later and using Git to revert

Re: Proposed plan for Tomcat 10

On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 4:03 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > Hi, > > First of all an update. > > I have a first pass of the javax.* -> jakarta.* migration tool > implemented. I have used it to convert the JSTL JARs used by Tomcat's > example web application and by the unit tests. The unit tests now all >

Proposed plan for Tomcat 10

Hi, First of all an update. I have a first pass of the javax.* -> jakarta.* migration tool implemented. I have used it to convert the JSTL JARs used by Tomcat's example web application and by the unit tests. The unit tests now all pass. I have updated my "jakarta" branch [1] to include these chan